PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood
of Railroad Signalmen on the former Texas and
Louisiana Lines of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company:



OPINION OF BOARD: Following a full and impartial investigative
hearing, Claimant was dismissed from service for
violation of Rules M-630, M-638 and 801 in connection with his failure
to inspect an adequate number of warning signals in July and August
1976 and his further failure to report such shortcomings.

Of the Rules referred to, the Board finds particularly pertinent that portion of Rule 801 which properly forbids an employe to be "careless of the safety of . . . others" or to be "indifferent to duty". Whatever the mitigating circumstances may have been, as testified to by the Claimant, the results of his actions were indeed in contravention to the quoted Rule and contrary to responsible performance of duty. Making the situation of even great consequence is the consideration that the Claimant had been previously disciplined for a similar offense.

In finding that the Carrier properly disciplined the Claimant, the Board nevertheless holds the penalty of dismissal frca service to be excessive. Claimant has been out of service for an extended period, during which it is assumed that he has had cause to consider the seriousness and immaturity both in his neglect of duty and in his failure to advise his superiors on a timely basis.

The Board will therefore order the Claimant to be restored to duty promptly, with seniority and other rights unimpaired, but without back pay.
Award Number 22053
Docket Number SG-22033

Page 2



That the parties waived oral hearing;

That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

That the Agreement was violated to the extent shown in Opinion.

A W A R D

Claim sustained to the extent indicated in the Opinion and

Findings.

ATTEST: e~& pAaznv-~r



NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

By Order of Third Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 12th day of May 197$.