(Brotherhood of ;.1aintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis



(1) The suspension of Laborer Jimmy F. Wooten from January 6, 1976 to February 17, 1976 for his alleged failure to protect
his assignment on January 5, 1976 was without just and sufficient cause and extremely disproportionate to the offense with which he was charged (TRRA 1976-11).

(2) The benefits and privileges stipulated within Agreement Rule 24(d) shall now_.be applied to the claimant."

OPINION OF BOARD: In this case, Claimant Jimmy Wooten was suspended
from service and following,<a hearing on a charge
of being absent without proper authorization on January 5, 1976, was
assessed discipline of twenty-eight (28) workdays.

From our careful review of the entire record in this case, we find that Claimant Wooten has received all of the due process rights to which he is entitled under the Rules Agreement. The Leering contains sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by Carrier that discipline was warranted. However, it is our opinion that a twenty (20) workday suspension, under the facts of this case, would be commensurate to the offense, and it is so ordered.





'That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Zmoloyes within the meaning of the Railway Labor. Act, as apprswded June 21, 1934;



That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        That the discipline was excessive.


                  A W A R D


        Claim sustained to the extent indicated in the CDlnion.


                      NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                      By Order of Third Division


ATTEST: P44~Al~
        Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 31st day of August 1978.

    RE


031
      CEI VED


SEP 2 2 1978

      Office -