(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
 ( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
 ( Express and Station Employes
 PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
 (Southern Pacific Transportation Company
 ( (Pacific Lines)

(a) The Southern Pacific Transportation Company violated the Clerks' Agreement extant when it arbitrarily and without Agreement support required Mrs. H. C. Jeung to abandon her position and the duties attached thereto in the Yard Timekeeper's Section to go into the Train Timekeeper's Section and perform duties of a Trainman's Timekeeper, and;

 (b) The Southern Pacific Transportation Company shall now be required to allow Mrs. H. C. Jeung an additional eight (8) hours' compensation at rate of Timekeeper October 25, 26 and 29, 1973 and each work day thereafter until she is returned to the Timekeeper position in the Yard Section from which she was arbitrarily removed.

 OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant here disputes her utilization in time
 keeping functions other than those which she
 allegedly normally performs. In this particular case, Claimant was
 given trainmen audits to handle in lieu of yard audits which she had
 been handling prior to the claim date.

 The record shows that Claimant was one among 61 timekeepers in the San Francisco General Office at the time the claim arose. Her position, along with the sixty others, are all bulletined with the same hours of assignment, same meal period and same rest days. They are all five (5) day positions (with no relief on rest days), they all have the same rate of pay and they all do timekeeping and related work.

 Under the circumstances of this record, and the rules cited for support of this claim, we are unable to find any agreement violation. Accordingly, we deny. the claim.


        FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


        That the parties waived oral hearing;


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

 That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        That the Agreement was not violated.


                    A W A R D


        Claim denied.


                          NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                          By Order of Third Division


ATTEST: Ale

        Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 29th day of September 1978.
                              C CEI veD


                              OCT 12 1978


                              90 Office - 5 ~0

                              (