NATIONAL RA MCAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
T~ DIVISION Docket Humber SG-22040
James F. Scearce, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
(The Lang Island Rail Road Company
STAMM CIF
CLAIt4: "Claims of the General Committee of the Brotherhood
of Railroad Signalman on the Long Island Rail Road:
sG-13-76
(A) Carrier violated the current agreement when it denied
Mr'. J. P. Backer, T & T Maintainer, headquarters Ronkonkoma, Hew York,
position
#6128,
which was bulletined on advertisement #1715 and awarded
to a junior qualified employee, Mr. E. Howarth, on bulletin #1117,
copies of which are attached hereto for ready reference.
(B) Carrier should now be required to compensate
Mr. J. P. Backes, T & T Maintainer, the difference of his present rate
$7.9952
per hour and that of Assistant Foreman entrance rate
$8.8891
per hour,, which equals
$0.8939
per hoax', for as long as the violation
is allowed to stand. It is noted that this is a continuing claim and
that the monetary claim will of coarse change with the length 'of time
that the junior employee occupies position
78.
Also that Carrier
should be required to amend the seniority roster to the extent that
Mr. Backes' name appear before the Junior qualified employee.
Claim Ho. 2
SG-16-76
On behalf of 8. J. Sivasl.ian for the difference in pay between
that of Sigmalmaa and Assistant Foreman
($9.1244
per day), commencing
February
4, 1976,
and that he be awarded seniority in the Foreman's
class effective
2/4/76.°
OPINION OF
BOARD: This case joins a long list of other ones between
these same parties over similar or identical
circumstances. Perhaps most similar is Award
20569,
wherein there, as
here, the Carrier awarded the position of Assistant Foreman to a
qualified employe who was less senior than the Claimant; here, there are
two Claimants more senior than the pramated employe. Prior Boards have
Award Number 22293 Page 2
Docket Number sG-22040
consistently held that the authority to determine qualifications for a
position is the exclusive right of the Carrier and, once determined,
the burden shifts to the Organization to show such actions are arbitrary
and capricious.
In 20569, the Hoard defined the method by which "arbitrariness
and impropriety° on Carrier's part could be demonstrated in such cases:
establishment oaf a Claimant's qualifications for the position in
question by probative evidence. The Organization argues that, if
some
means
of testing validity of the Carrier's actions is not
available, thea_the provisions of Rule 47 (b) relative to seniority- -_
are rendered meaningless. It is equally obvious that
less
senior
employees, in a given classification, can attain both experience and
seniority in a higher class, to the detriment of more senior employes
in the same classification, as per Rule 34 of the Agreement, where they
are afforded the opportunity to hold such jobs on a temporary basis.
This Board affirms the authority of the Carrier to make the judgment as
to qualifications for positions; but we likewise hew to the line of
reasoning in Award 20569 as heretofore cited.
In this case, by means of its various exchanges of communications on the property, the Organization
burden of demonstrating the Claimants' qualifications. While concluding
that the Organization has not done so here, due to a lack of clarity in
certain of its exhibits and some unsubstantiated assertions, we consider
it worthy of note that a test for arbitrariness and impropriety in this
type of claim is not beyond the force of reason.
FIIDIRM: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning
of
the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
Award Number 22293 Page 3
Docket Number SG-2204o
A W A R D
Claims are denied.
NATICK" RAILROAD ADJUSTHM BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST: ///~
.
-Execative Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 31st day of January 1979.