NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-22448
George S. Roukis, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
( Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Norfolk and Western Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-8575) that:
1. Carrier violated the Agreement, between the parties,
when on August 5, 1977, Mr. John R. Fields was dismissed without any
chance to attend the investigation scheduled by the company.
2. The Carrier's action was unjust, unreasonable and an
abuse of Carrier's discretion. The discipline was assessed without
any proof whatever of the charges that were made.
3. This discipline shall be set aside and Mr. Field's
request for a leave of absence will be granted until such time as he
is able to appear.
OPINION OF BOARD: On June 14, 1977, claimant was imprisoned for a
period of two (2) to five (5) years as a result
of his guilty plea on a charge of attempted rape.
On July 5, 1977, claimant was advised by Carrier to appear
for a formal investigation on the charge of unauthorized absence
from duty since June 16, 1977. After one postponement granted at
the request of claimant's representative, the investigation was
conducted an July 29, 1977. Claimant, of course, was not present.
By notice dated August 5, 1977, claimant was dismissed from service.
Although we recognize that each discipline case mist be
considered on its own merits, we find that this case is strikingly
similar in all important aspects to the one handled by this Division
in Award No. 20294. The principals are the same. The basic contentions of the petitioner are the sam
must also be the same. We fully subscribe to and adopt the principles
enunciated in Award No. 20294, which are quoted in pertinent part
hereinafter:
Award Number 22368 Page 2
Docket Number CL-22448
"We have no difficulty in issuing a denial award under
this record because Claimant himself, by his own misconduct in perpetrating a number of severe crime
violence, affected his contractual right to be present
at the investigation. There is absolutely no evidence
of record to suggest that Carrier was a motivating
factor in precluding Claimant's attendance."
We will deny the claim.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning' of the
Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has,jgi_sdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D "? _= W
6
r
11
Claim denied.
~`1C;':.CO
NATIONAL RAa.RM ADJUSTMENT BARD
By Order of Third Division
V
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of March
1979.