NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-22408
Joseph A. Sickles, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
( Express and Station Employer
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GIr-8546) that:
(1) The Carrier violated the current Clerks' Agreement at
Fort Worth, Texas, when an Legal Holiday, Washington's Birthday,
February 21, 1977, it failed and refused to permit Mr. C. L. Brannon
to work his regular assignment, which was a regular work day and a
holiday.
(2) Carrier shall now be required to compensate Mr. C. L.
Brannon eight
(8) hours' pay at the time and one-half rate of his
regular
assignment, Switching
Clerk Position No. 4399, for February 21,
1977, in addition to any compensation already received for that date.
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant was regularly assigned to Position 4399,
8:00 a. m. to 5:00 p. m., Mondays through Fridays.
On February 21, 1977 (Washington's Birthday), Carrier "blanked" the
assignment. However, the Claimant insists that another clerk performed
work which otherwise would have been performed by him.
Rule 45 (e) states that when work is to be performed on a
day which is not part of any
assignment, the
regular employe shall be
utilized (with certain exceptions not here applicable). Thus, reasons
the Claimant, he - and he alone - had the right to perform the work
on the holiday.
The record supports the Employe's contention that the other
clerk did perform the work in question, but the Carrier states that
even if that is the case, said individual normally performs identical
work on weekends, and a certain Addendum No. 10 permits that activity.
'i
Award Number 22430 Page 2_
Docket Number CL-22408
We are of the.view that Rule 45 applies - not Addendum 10 -
and that under these circumstances, the regular employe, i.e.,
Claimant, was entitled to the work, notwithstanding the fact that
the other clerk may have performed the same-function on Claimant's
rest days. In this regard, our Award 20187 controls.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the.-whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing,
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes Within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:__~
Ao&
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of June 1979.