NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-22319
Joseph A. Sickles, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-8474) that:
1) Carrier violated the Clerks' Rules Agreement at Chicago,
Illinois in Seniority District No. 152 on June 1, 1976 when. it unjustly
treated employe Barbara Cram by failing to award her Assistant Cashier
Position No. 89320 and in lieu thereof awarded the position to a
junior employe.
2) Carrier shall now be required to assign Employe B. Crum
to Assistant Cashier Position No. 89320.
3) Carrier shall further be required to compensate Employe
B. Crum an additional eight (8) hours pay at the pro rata rate of
Position 89320 for June 1, 1976 and for each subsequent workday until
the violation is corrected.
4) Carrier shall be further required to pay seven percent
interest compounded
anm·=»e
on such rate until such time as
claimant is made whole.
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant applied for an advertised vacancy
(Assistant Cashier Position No. 89320), but it
was awarded to a junior employe because, according to Carrier, Claimant
"lacked sufficient fitness and ability."
Subsequent to an "unjust treatment" investigation, Carrier
restated its conclusion which prompted this claim.
Rules 7 and 8 provides:
Award Number 22442 Page 2
Docket Number CL-22319
"RULE 7 - PROMOTION
Employes covered by these rules shall be in line
for promotion. Promotion shall be based on seniority,
fitness and ability; fitness and ability being sufficient,
seniority shall prevail.
NOTE: The word 'Sufficient' is intended to
more clearly establish the right of
the senior employe to the new position
or vacancy where two or more employes
have adequate fitness and ability."
"RULE 8 - TIME IN WHICH TO QUALIFY
(a) When an employe bids for and is assigned to a
permanent vacancy or new position he will be allowed
thirty (30) working days in which to qualify and will
be given full cooperation of department heads and others
in his efforts to do so. However, this will not prohibit
an employe from being removed prior to thirty (30)
working days when manifestly incompetent. If an employe
fails to qualify he shall retain all seniority rights
but cannot displace a regularly assigned employe. He
will be considered furloughed as of date of disqualification and if he desires to protect his
he must comply with the provisions of Rule 12(b)."
The parties have cited various Awards which deal with the
rights and obligations of the respective parties in these types of
disputes, but we find no need to comment upon those citations because
we are unable to find any basis for sustaining the claim. In short,
we find nothing of substance which reasonably suggests that "personal
reasons" motivated the Carrier's action, or that Claimant was
victimized by prejudgment. The thirty (30) day rule does not require
an initial appointment.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
Award Number 22442 page 3
Docket Number CL-22319
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJOSTMQRT ECAED
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 29th day of June 1979.