RATICKAL RAILROAD AWUSTMET HOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Humber MS-22615
PARTIES TO DISPME: ( d Workman
(Consolidated Rail Corporation
(Former Penn Central Transportation Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM- "(1) Penn Central violated Lloyd Workman's rights
under agreement between Penn Central and the
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Rule 30 part (e) on January 21,
1976
I returned to work as a Major Foreman after being off for about
17 months for on duty accident (L-4 & L-5 removed) on 1/22/76 was told
by P. Blodgett to do labor work and on 1/23/76 took Hook of Rules teat at
Toledo, O8 and alleged got
83
was told by P. Deckked that I could not
work as form", in violation of Rule 34.
(2) On 1/22/76 P. Blodgett threatned L. Workman bodily harm
and did not comply with Rule (a) - (b) - (d) - (e) - (f) - (g).. of 34.
(3)
violation of Rule
36
(a) and part (2) of role
36
- failed
to comply with sale 45, violated rule 37
Case Bo.
1834),
Federal Court RulingL
,
(4) Violated the Railvey ~Partscof William Sticker Actpending
Penn Central Trans. & CONLUI are alleged accused of being a party of not
2/tomp10lingo! Ibtttheceew
(.Nab)
n
(cj~(and Rules Movement of agreement of
(5) Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employee Union failed
to liquidate this matter in violation of the Landrum Griffin Act.
(6)
As petitioner request a award of
$lo0,0o0.oo
as provided
in the Mediation Agreement of February 10, 1971.
(7) Lloyd Workman rights were violated in regards no hearing
and no copy in writing was furnished of date taken out of service.
(8) Request a award of all back and future wages.
(9) Request a Oral hearing on all matters on 1 and 2 ages.
Public Law 94-210 and Title Law 93-236 under Title of the
RRRRA.
Award womber 22481 Page 2
Docket fiber Ms-22615
OPIitMN OF HOARDS The record is clear that the claim Petitioner is
asserting before the Hoard was not handled on the
property as required by Section 3, First (i) of the Railway Labor Act,
Circular No. 1 of the National Railroad Adjustment Hoard, or the rules
of the applicable agreement covering the craft in which claimant was
formerly employed. The claim must, therefore, be dismissed.
The record also above that in settlement of a personal
injury snit against the Carrier, the claimant, on March 4, 1977, signed
a General Release in which he agreed.to "release and forever discharge"
the Carrier from:
'...all claims, demands, actions and causes of
action of every kind whatsoever and including,
bat without limitation of the foregoing, all
liability for damagea, costs, expenses and
compensation of any kind, nature or description
now existing or which may hereafter rise from .
or oat of injuries and damages, known or unknown,
,-,-.,..,permanent or otherwise, sustained or received
by axe "
on the same date, March 4, 1977, claimant addressed a
witnessed letter to the Carrier, in which be stated:
"1h
consideration of the payment made to me this
date by the Consolidated Rail Corporation, I here-
, by agree that I will not present myself for
employment or re-employment at a,:p time in the
ftture by the Consolidated Rail Corporation."
The General Release of Match
4,
1977 and claimant's letter
of the same date preclude the progression of aoy other dispute
arising out of his employment by or in behalf of claimant, and also
requires dismissal of the present dispute.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Hoard, after giving
the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon:
and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
Avard lfnmber 22481 Page 3
Docket Nambe: MS-22615
That this Division of the Adjustment Hoard has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the claim be dismissed.
A 4l A R D
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAIaOAD ADJOSTMW HOARD
Pr Order of Third Division
ATTEST: 1
cutive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinoia, this 24th day of August
1979.