(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPOSE:
(Southern Pacific Transportation Company
( (Pacific Lines)



(a) The Southern Pacific Transportation Company violated the current Clerks' Agreement when it dismissed Mr. E. W. Genest from service September 9, 1976; and

(b) The Southern Pacific Transportation Company shall now be required to reinstate Mr. Genest and to compensate him one day's pay at the rate of Bill Clerk Position No. 319, $50.68 per day, beginning September 9, 1976, and continuing each work day thereafter until returned to service with all rightsunimpaired, including seniority, insurance, hospitalization, and all other Agreement emoluments.

OPIN1OP OF BOARDi Claimant entered the service of the Carrier as a clerk
on January 12, 1971. On August 19, 1976, he was
regularly assigned as bill clerk at Carrier's Los Angeles Yard.

Following a rather lengthy investigation conducted on August 30, 1976, claimant was notified on September 9, 1976, of his dismissal from service for violation of the following portions of Rules 801 and 810:












The Hoard has carefully reviewed the transcript of the investigation and finds substantial evidence to support a violation of the cited rules. At approximately 6:15 P. M., August 19, 1976, claimant was instructed by the Assistant Chief Clerk to drive a carryall truck to Carrrier's shop area and pick up a train crew. The Assistant Chief Clerk testified that claimant responded by stating that if he had to work as a messenger, he would be sick and to mark him off. Subsequently claimant was instructed by Carrier's Assistant Terminal Agent to drive the carryall truck to the shop area to stated to mark him off sick. The Assistant Terminal Agent stated that he did not give permission to claimant to be off; that he asked the claimant the nature of his illness and claimant responded "..anything you want to call it, I'm going home sick."

We are inclined to agree with the Carrier's description of the case as a "knee-jerk claim of illness in response to an order to perform a service the employe considers undesirable." The Board does not condone such action by any employe. However, it would seem that the time claimant has been out of service should be sufficient discipline for the offense.

We will award that claimant be restored to service, with seniority rights unimpaired, but without pay for time lost.

        FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


        That the parties waived oral hearing;


That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        That permanent dismissal was excessive.

                    Award Number 22498 Page 3

                    Docket Number CL-22607

                    A W A H D


Claim sustained to the extent indicated in the Opinion and Findings.

                        NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTN.''.NT HOARD

                        By Order of Third Division


ATTEST:~H/'

                gaze-0a.-

        Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 31st day of August 1979.