NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-22427
George S. Roukis, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
( Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Norfolk and Western Railway
STATEMENT OF CIAI14: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-8578) that:
1. Carrier violated the provisions of the April 1, 1973
Master Agreement in general, Rules 27 and 42 in particular, when on
September 9, 1977 they arbitrarily and capriciously dismissed
Mr. R. L. Brown.
2. Carrier's action was unjust, unreasonable and an abuse of
Carrier's discretion.
3. Carrier shall reinstate Mr. Brown, with seniority and
all other rights and privileges unimpaired"and pay him for all lost
time.
OPINION OF BOARD: The fact situation in this case is not in dispute.
In fact, claimant readily admits that he released
the train in question from the siding in question contrary to the
specific instructions which he had received from the Terminal Trainmaster. Therefore, the only issue
concerns the severity of the discipline which was imposed.
The record reveals that claimant was previously dismissed
from Carrier's service in 1975 for permitting a yard crew to pass a
Stop and Stay signal without proper authority. This Board, in Award
No. 21512, considered "claimant's many years of service" and reinstated
him to service in April, 1977 with the hope that he would correct his
improper work practices. Less than one (1) month following his reinstatement to service, he admitted
instructions and permitted an improper train movement to occur.
Award Number 22505 Page 2
Docket Number CL-22427
On the basis of the total record in this case, we cannot
say that Carrier's action was arbitrary or capricious. The claim for
reinstatement must be and is denied,
FINDIMS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was. not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL. RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST: ezoo
'41.
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 31st day of August
1979.
1
r
x