i
NATIONAL. RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Award Number 22522
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL.-22605
Paul C. Carter, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
( Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Pittsburgh and Lake Erie
( Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-8644) that:
(a) .Carrier violated the rules of the Agreement effective
September 1, 1946, revised December 1, 1956, particularly Rules 4
and 20, among others, when on September 16, 1977, it dismissed Mr.
Charles Welsh, Jr., from active service. Carrier's action in dismissing Mr. Welsh from service on un
predetermined guilt and suspicion, therefore, was unjust, unreasonable
and an abuse of Carrier's discretion.
(b) .Carrier shall now restore Mr. Welsh to active service
with all his seniority rights unimpaired.
(c) Carrier shall expunge from his record any notation
placed thereon as a result of its improper action and compensate
Mr. Welsh for all time held out of service, including protective
agreement payments which would have accrued to him had he remained
in service, inclusive of reimbursement for any medical expense,
hospital, surgical or related expenses that Mr. Welsh is required to
assume for himself and/or dependents to the extent that such expenses
would have been paid by Travelers Insurance Company had claimant
continued in carrier's service.
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant was assigned to clerical Job No. 117
at Carrier's McKees Rock, Pa., Freight Office,
with assigned hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., with lunch period
12:00 Noon to 1:00 p. m.
On September 16, 1977, claimant and one other clerical
employe from the McKees Rock Freight Office, were observed by four
of Carrier's officials separately entering a bar known as the Beacon
Club, which is located a short distance from the Freight Office.
i
O
Award Number 22522 Page 2
Docket Number CL-22605
After the claimant entered the Beacon Club, the four
Carrier officials entered the club. While in the Beacon Club,
Carrier's Superintendent of Stations advised both of the employes
that they were removed from Carrier's service for violation of
Carrier's General Rule G and Rule J-1.
On September 28, 1977, claimant was instructed to attend
a formal investigation at 1:00 P.M., October 7, 1977, at Carrier's
headquarters in Pittsburgh, Pa., "to develop the facts and
determine your responsibility, if any, for alleged violation of
Rule G and Rule J-1 of the Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company
General Rules concerning incident and observation that occurred
at 3:20 p. m., September 16, 1977, at McKees Rock, Pa." A similar
type investigation was scheduled for the other employe involved
for 10:00 a.m., on .October
7, 1977.
Carrier's Rules G and J-1 read:
"G. The use of alcoholic beverages, intoxicants or
narcotics while on duty or subject to duty;
being under the influence of alcoholic beverages,
intoxicants or narcotics while on duty; or
possession of alcoholic beverages, intoxicants
or narcotics while on duty is prohibited."
"J-1. Employees will not absent themselves from duty
without proper authority."
The claimant was present at the investigation scheduled for
1:00 P. M., October 7, 1977, and was represented by three union officials.
The officials who observed the employes entering the Beacon Club were
present and testified as to their observations.
On October 13, 1977, the claimant was notified of his
dismissal from service effective that date.
We have carefully reviewed the transcript of the investigation conducted on October 13, 1977, and fi
substantive procedural rights was violated.
Without detailing the evidence presented at the investigation,
suffice it to say that there was substantial evidence produced to
Award Number 22522 Page 3
Docket Number CL-22605
support the charges against claimant. The record also shows that
claimant had previously been disciplined on two occasions for
failing to properly protect his job assignment.
There is no proper basis for this Board to interfere
with the discipline imposed.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That. the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of September
.1979.