(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company ( (Southern Region)



(1) The dismissal of Track Laborer Eddie L. Sturdivant, Jr. was without just or sufficient cause; was capriciously and arbitrarily imposed; was extremely disproportionate to the offense with which charged (System File C(So)-D-492/MG 1951).

(2) The Carrier shall reinstate Claimant Sturdivant to service with pay for all time lost."

OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant had been in carrier's service about fcur and
one-half years, and in July, 1977, was regularly
assigned to Force 1121, with headquarters at Elk, West Virginia.

Following investigation conducted on August 9, 1977, claimant was notified on August 19, 1977, that he was dismissed from service for being absent from duty without permission on July 18, 20, and 21, 1977.

We have reviewed the transcript of the investigation conducted on August 9, 1977, and find substantial evidence to support the charge for which claimant was dismissed.

The record also shows that this was the fourth assessment of discipline against claimant for similar offenses. It is apparent that the prior discipline did not have the desired effect.









That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Emplqres within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved dune 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Hoard has jurisdiction over the dispute involved perein; and

        That the Agreement was not violated.


                    A W A R D


        Claim denied.


                        NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                        By Order of Third Division


ATTEST:
        Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of September 1979.