NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJLTSHOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Humber w-22748
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company
( (Southern Region)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
that:
(1) The dismissal of Trac'sman R. Smith for allegedly
assaulting Assistant Track Supervisor W. R. Adams with a shovel on
November
9,
1977 was without just and sufficient cause and on the basis
of unproven charges System File C(So)-D-547/1-2089.
(2) Trackman R. Smith shall moor be allowed the benefits
prescribed in Agreement Rule 21(e)."
OPINICK OF Claimant was employed as a trackman on Force 1283,
under the supervision of a foreman and an
Assistant Track Supervisor. On November 10, 1977, Carrier's Manager
Engineering wrote
claimant
in parts
"Attend investigation at the Y.M.C.A. Conference
Room, Walbridge, Ohio at
9:00
am., Tuesday,
November 22, 1977.
"You are charged with conduct unbecoming an
employee when on November
9,
1977, at approximately
11:15 am. you assaulted W. R. Adams. Assistant
Track Supervisor, with shovel while on duty on
company property at Presque Isle Docks. Ohio.
"
At the request of the Organization, the investigation vas
postponed until Decd 1, 1977. A copy of the transcript of the
investigation has been made a part of the record. Following the
investigation, claimant was dismissed from the services of the Carrier
by letter dated December
19,
1977. The General Chairman of the
Organization appealed claimant's dismissal up to and including the
highest officer of the Carrier designated to handle disputes of this
nature, and each appeal was declined.
Award lumber 22616 Page 2
Docket Number MW-22748
The Carrier contends in part that the claim submitted to
the Board is not the same claim as handled on the property up to and
including the Carrier's highest designated officer. We find no proper
basis for the contention of the Carrier. The
manner
of appeal of
discipline cases on the property is as outlined in Rule 21. The claim
was not substantially amended on appeal to the Board. The Carrier was
in no way misled or taken by surprise.
As to the merits of the dispute, we find that substantial
evidence was adduced at the investigation to support the charge against
the claimant. The Organization contends that the claimant did not
attempt to strike the Assistant Track Supervisor with the shovel, ands
therefore, did not assault him. However, the Foreman and the Assistant
Track Supervisor stated in the investigation that claimant swung the
sbovel toward the Assistant Track Supervisor and stated to him that he
would like to bash his (the Assistant Track Supervisor's ) face in with
the shovel. The word "assault" is defined in Webster's New World
Dictionary - Second College edition:
"Assault - 1. a violent attack, either pbysical
or verbal
. 3.
Saw, an unlawful
threat or unsuccessful attempt to do
physical harm to another, causing a
present fear of tmne!iate harm "
Based upon the entire record, the Board finds that Carrier's
actions in dismissing claimant from service were not arbitrary,
capricious or in bad faith. The claim will, therefore, be denied.
FINDIMS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved Tune 21,
1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
Award Nub 22616 Page 3
Docket Nmsber W-22748
A W A R D
Claim denied.
HATIWfAL RAILROAD ADJUST BOARD
$y Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
~/aL.
Execnti7e Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 9th day of November 1979.