RATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT HOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Humber
h5d-22206
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employer
PARTIES TO DISPOTE:
(Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
( (Former Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the-System Committee of the Brotherhood
that:
(1) The dismissal of Messrs. D. L. Carter, J.
L.
Rutherford,
R. W. Crain, R. D. Drew,
L.
D. McAdoo and C. R. Echols was improper,
without just
and
sufficient cause and in violation of the Agreement
(Carrier's File % 214
-75).
(2)
The claimants be reinstated with seniority and all other
rights unimpaired and they be compensated for all wage loss suffered."
OPINION OF HOARD: Claimants were the Foreman and members of Section ,
Gang Ho.
5760
working out of bunk cars near Joppa,
Illinois. The gang had been warned during early April
1976
by Rosdmaster
Pratt that production was not sufficient and that he would be checking
periodically on their progress. Thereafter Pratt assigned Foreman Redclond
toAasist Foreman Carter
and
to
keep an eye on Gang 5760. On the
morning of Friday, April
23, 1976
Roadmsater Pratt and Trainmaster
Everett made an unannounced inspection of the bank cars and the Gang's
work site near Karnak, Illinois. On the basis of that inspection
Claimants were notified to appear for investigation into the following:
"All of you are charged with being in possession of
and consuming intoxicant and/or narcotics in and about
the bunk cars assigned to you at Joppa, Illinois the
night of Thursday, April
22, 1976
and/or earlier
morning hours of Friday, April
23, 1976.
All of you
are also charged with failure to commence work on time
Friday, April
23, 1976.
Messrs. Drew and Rutherford are further charged
with failure to report for duty the entire day of
Friday, April
23, 1976.
Award Number 22637 Page 2
Docket Number W-22206
"Mr. Crain is further charged with being under the
influence of intoxicants or narcotics while on
duty Thursday, April 22,
1976
and with being in
no condition to perform service when found on
property at Karnak, 117.imis at about 8:x+0 A.M.
Friday, April 23,
1976."
Following the investigation Claimants were judged culpable and terminated
from all service.
The hearing transcript shows that Pratt and Everett arrived at
the bunk cars by Hi Rail vehicle shortly before 8:00 am. Gang
5760
was scheduled to begin work at 7:30 am. As Pratt and Everett approached
the bunk cars on foot, Foreman Carter appeared and shouted in words or
substance, "Get out of here, Pratt is around somewhere." Several men
thereupon burst through the doors, leapt into nearby vehicles and sped
off. Pratt and Everett entered the bunk car where the Claimants had spent
the previous night. They found in excess of twenty (20) empty beer cans
on the floor, an open half bottle of vodka and two six packs of unopened
cold beer. A note on the table signed by Drew and Rutherford stated that
they were drunk and would see the others at Karnak. The car was in a
state of filthy disarray with the garbage cans fill of additional empty
beer cans. Substantial evidence, including admissions, establishes that
Claimants had an alcoholic binge the night of April 22, 1976 in that
bunk car. The additional charges against Drew, Rutherford and Crain
likewise are suported by substantial evidence. The excuses offered by
Claimants are too pathetically inadequate to require much elaboration.
Fore ale we are wt persuaded that the condition of the bunk car can
be attributed to "strong winds" blowing through the area, that the
empty beer cans all were "ash trays," or that the unconstmied beer and
aleobol were just being stored for transport home after duty hours. We
take no joy in presiding over the wholesale dismissal of a .gang of
employer but clearly Carrier acted reasonably in-coualndlag that they
were culpable and, given the offenses, the penalty was not excessive.
FMIRGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Hoard, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employer within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21,
1934;
Award Number 22637 Page 3
Docket Number NW-22206
That this Division of the Adjustment Hoard has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTS HOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
zL
v&Z~qExecutiveSecretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of November 1979.