NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-22838
Martin F. Scheinman, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
( Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-8788) that:
1. The Carrier violated the effective Clerks' Agreement
when it refused to permit Clerk A. E. Wrobel to exercise his displacement rights over a junior emplo
displaced, thereby depriving him of the work to which he was entitled;
2. The Carrier shall now compensate Mr. Wrobel for eight (8)
hours' pay at the time and one-half rate of Position GT-1160-R for
November 4, 1977.
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant, A. E. Wrobel, was the regularly assigned
incumbent of Position GT-522, a seven day position
with assigned hours from 11:00 P. M. to 7:00 A. M. and rest days of
Sunday and Monday. Under date of November 2, 1977, to be effective on
November 4, 1977, Ms. Charlotte Carlin, an employe senior in service
to claimant, exercised her displacement rights to Position GT-552.
Claimant was thereby displaced from that position. Claimant, in turn,
exercised displacement rights over junior employe L. Lear, incumbent
of Position GT-1160-R, also to be effective November 4, 1977. Position
GT-1160-R is a relief assignment with the following work week:
Sunday GT-552 11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M.
Monday Rest Day
Tuesday Rest Day
Wednesday GT-550 7:00 A. M. to 3:00 P. M.
Thursday GT-550 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M.
Friday GT-554 3:00 P. M. to 11:00 P. M.
Saturday GT-554 3:00 P. M. to 11:00 P. M.
Claimant was displaced on Friday, November 4, 1977 and sought to make
his displacement on that same date in order to avoid a loss of earnings.
Award Number 22684
Docket Number CL-22838
Page 2
The Carrier refused to honor Claimant's displacement on November 4, 1977,
and instead, deferred it until the following day, November 5, 1977.
Thus, Mr. Wrobel was not an incumbent of any position on November 4,
1977. He seeks a day's pay for not being allowed to displace on
November 4, 1977.
Carrier relies upon a 1959 case settlement for disposition
of the matter. However, that settlement did not involve an identical
fact situation.
The issue here is whether Claimant can exercise a displacement
immediately upon actually being displaced. There is no evidence presented
of such a prohibition. That being the case, Rule 42 (a) is applicable
to an employe moving from one assignment to another (Award 20 of the
Public Board 31 between these parties).
-See-also
Award 22636 The
claim will be sustained.
FILINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
i
That this Division of the Adjusimient Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and -----=___
The Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim sustained.
ATTEST:
Executive se
~a
cretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th
NATIONAL. RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
day of December 1979.