NATIONAL. RAILROAD ADJUSPMENZ BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-22552
James F. Scearce, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
( Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Cormittee of the Brotherhood
(GL.-8576) that:
(1) Carrier violated the terms of the Agreement between the
parties when, on various dates during December, 1975, it required and
permitted employees not covered thereby, to perform the assigned duties
of third-trick Block-Operator-handling switches position at WJ Tower,
Wilsmere, Delaware.
(2) Carrier shall, because of the violation set out above,
compensate the named idle and available employees, eight (8) hours' pay
at the third-trick "BS" position WJ Tower rate of pay for each date, as
hereafter shown:
T. A. Saxton -December 1, 3 and 15, 1975
P. C. Bonifacino - December 3, 5, 9, 10, 16 and 17, 1975
P. R. Schmeusser - December 8 and 22, 1975
G. B. Goldsberry - December 13 and 20, 1975
J. B. Towner -December 2, 1975
J. J. Turner -December 7, 14 and 21, 1975
M. D. Harryman -December 12 and 19, 1975.
OPINION OF BOARD: Basis for this claim arose when a vacancy for a third
trick Operator position was left vacant at WJ Tower
in the (Wilsmere) Wilmington, Delaware yard. The claim initiated thereafter
asserts that Yardmasters performed duties reserved to that position and,
with particularity, communications directly with Train Dispatcher relative
to the movement and blocking of trains. The claim also asserted or implied
the copying of train orders and blocking of trains.
The record indicates no proof that any trains were actually blocked
or orders copied. As to the communication aspects raised in the claim, the
Organization seemingly depends upon a former Telegrapher's Rule strictly
limiting conveyance by telephone or other devices of train orders and
messages to Dispatcher by Operators. Such provision was replaced by a new
I
i
II
Award Number 22718 Page 2
Docket Number CL-22552
Rule issued concurrent with the
merger of
the Telegrapher craft into the
Organization; the new Rule has no such restrictive language.
While the Organization raises several other matters on its
ex parte submission to the Board, the record indicates such subjects were
not part of the claim, not discussed on the property and thus will not
be addressed here.
We find no basis to affirm the Organization's claim herein.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim is denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 11th day of January 1980.
i
I
I