NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-22694
George S. Roukis, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
' (Norfolk and Western Railway Company (Lake Region)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when, on and subsequent to
January 24, 1977, eight (8) machine operators were used to perform
laborer's work in connection with the construction of new track to serve
the Delco Plant at Muncie, Indiana, during which time Extra Gang Laborers
L. C. Melson, L. P. Piercy, T. D. King, A. D. Randolph, R. F. Snyder,
G. J.
Reichert, W
. E. McClellan and Utah Dockery were furloughed and
available and willing to perform such laborer's work (System File MW-MUN77-33).
(2) Each of the employes identified in (1) above be reimbursed
for the wage loss suffered as a consequence of said violation."
OPINION OF BOARD: Before proceeding to a substantive assessment of the
dispute's merits, this Board must dispose of the
procedural objections raised in petitioner's rebuttal submission. Based
on the accumulated documentary record, we do not find any specific
unequivocal evidence that Carrier advanced exclusivity arguments on the
property.
Careful reading of Carrier's written correspondence dated
April 11, 1977, June 7, 1977 and. September 29, 1977 reveals that Carrier
considered the work of machine operators distinguishable from that of
laborers and that petitioners failed to demonstrate that the machine
operators performed laborers' work. An exclusivity argument would
assert that the contested work was traditionally performed by both
position classifications and would require a showing by the initiating
party that the work by custom and practice accrued to that category of
employes. This is not the case here and thus we must exclude this
argument from our consideration pursuant to the requirements of
Circular 1. The same is true regarding the seniority displacements
articulated in Carrier's submission. They were not raised on the
property and, as such, are inadmissible before this Board.
U
Award Number 22779 Page 2
Docket Number MW-22694
On the other hand, we believe that petitioner adequately met
its required proof burden by specifically delineating the type of work
performed by extra gang laborers. It noted that this work included
laying tie, rail, putting on angle bars, laying switches, spiking and
gauging, etc. and further showed that the machine operators were not
using assigned machines, since they were being repaired at Frankfort,
Indiana, some eighty (80) miles away from the work situs. Moreover,
notwithstanding Carrier's lack of denial of the aforesaid specifications,
the Organization adduced three letters dated June 9, 1978 which were
written by three machine operators employed in the contested work project,
attesting that they did not operate any machinery, but instead performed
laborer's work on the construction of the new line that was being built
to the Delco Plant at Muncie, Indiana. The letters were served on the
Carrier before the August 28, 1978 ex parte submission and were permissible
evidence under our rules. The record, as developed on the property,
competently affirms petitioners' position and we are compelled by the
mandate of our appellate responsibility to affirm the claim.
We will, however, direct that the wage restitution be allowed
to only those furloughed employes who actually suffered wage losses as
a result of unemployment during the time period the machine operators
performed the disputed work.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes i=volved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim sustained to the extent expressed in the Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST;
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th day of March 1980,