NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENL BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number SG-22603
James F. Scearce, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railioad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Chicago and North Western Transportation Company
STATEMENT OF CIAIMs "Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood
of Railroad Signalmen on the Chicago and North
Western Transportation Company;
Claim No. 1
(a) On June 23, 24, and July 9, 1977, the carrier
violated the current Signalmen's Agreement,
particularly Rule 16, concerning the checking
out and checking in for Signal Maintainers as
per instructions issued by Signal Supervisor
Freund in his letter to all Signal Maintainers
dated June 22, 1977.
(b) Following dates and times made part of this
claim.
June 23, 1977 4 hours 45 minutes.
June 24, 1977 4 hours 30 minutes.
July 9, 1977 12 hours
Total of 21 hours 15 minutes.
(c) Carrier now be required to compensate former
Signal Maintainer J. R. Lamz formerly located
at Glen Ellyn, I11. now a supervisor on the
Iowa Division at his applicable overtime rate
of pay for all time held on a standby basis
for the dates and times listed above.
Award Number 22787 Page 2
Docket Number SG-22603
"
Claim No. 2
(a) On June 25, 26, July 2, 3, 4, 9, and 10, 1977, the
carrier violated the current Signalmen's Agreement,
particularly Rule 16, concerning the checking out and
checking in for Signal Maintainers as per instructions
issued by Signal Supervisor Freund in his letter to all
Signal Maintainers dated June 22, 1977.
(b) Following is the dates and times made part of this claim.
June 25, 1977 1 hour.
June 26, 1977 10 hours.
July 2, 1977 8 hours.
July 3, 1977 8 hours.
July 4, 1977 5 hours 30 minutes.
July 9, 1977 13 hours.
July 10, 1977 12 hours.
Total of 57 hours 30 minutes
(c) Carrier now be required to compensate Leading Signal
Maintainer T. A. Cross at his applicable overtime rate
of pay for all time held on a standby basis for the
dates and times listed above.
Claim No. 3
(a) On June 27, July 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 10, 1977, the carrier
violated the current Signalmen's Agreement, particularly
Rule 16, concerntrtg the checking out and checking in for
Signal Maintainers as per instructions issued by Signal
Supervisor Freund in his letter to all Signal Maintainers
dated June 22, 1977.
(b) Following dates and times made part of this claim.
June 27, 1977 4 hours.
July 1, 1977 2 hours 30 minutes
July 2, 1977 8 hours.
July 3, 1977 8 hours.
July 4, 1977 5 hours 30 minutes
July 8, 1977 8 hours 30 minutes
July 10, 1977 4 hours.
Total of 40 hours 30 minutes
(c) Carrier now be required to compensate Signal Maintainer
R. Vodden located at West Chicago, Ill. at his
applicable overtime rate of pay for all time held on
a standby basis for the dates and times listed above.
Award Number 22787 Page 3
Docket Number SG-22603
"
Claim No. 4
(a) On July 24, and July 26, 1977, the carrier violated the
current Signalmen's Agreement, particularly Rule 16,
concerning the checking out and checking in for
Signal Maintainers as per instructions issued by
Signal Supervisor Freund in his letter to all Signal
Maintainers dated June 22, 1977.
(b) Following dates and times made part of this claim.
July 24, 1977 5 hours.
July 26, 1977 4 hours.
Total of
9
hours.
(c) Carrier now be required to compensate Leading Signal
Maintainer T. A. Cross, located at West Chicago, 111.
at his applicable overtime rate of pay for all time
held on a standby basis for the dates and times listed
above.
Claim No. 5
.
(a) On July 24, and July 25, 1977, the carrier violated the
current Signalmen's Agreement, particularly, Rule 16
concerning the checking out and checking in for Signal
Maintainers as per instructions issued by Supervisor
Freund in his letter to all Signal Maintainers dated
June 22, 1977.
(b) Following dates and times made part of this claim.
July 24, 1977 4 hours.
July 25, 1977 4 hours.
Total of
8
hours.
(c) Carrier now be required to compensate Signal Maintainer
W. R. Vodden, located at West Chicago, 111. at his
applicable overtime rate of pay for all time held on
a standby basis for the times and dates listed above.
Award Number 22787 Page 4
Docket Number SG-22603
"
Claim No. 6.
(a) On August 5, 6, 7 and August 13, 1977, the carrier
violated the current Signalmen's Agreement, particularly,
Rule 16, concerning the checking out and checking in for
Signal Maintainers as per instructions issued by Signal
Supervisor Freund in his letter to all Signal Maintainers
dated June 22, 1977.
(b) Following dates and times are made part of this claim.
August 5, 1977 7 hours 30 minutes
August 6, 1977 3 hours
August 7, 1977 6 hours.
August 13, 1977 8 hours
Total of 24 hours 30 minutes
(c) Carrier now be required to compensate Leader Signal
Maintainer Thomas Cross, located at West Chicago,
Illinois at his applicable overtime rate of pay for
all time held on a standby basis for the times and
dates listed above.
Claim No. 7
(a) On August 6, 7, 12, 17, and 21st, 1977, the carrier
violated the current Signalmen's Agreement, particularly,
Rule 16 concerning the checking out and checking in for
Signal Maintainers as per instructions issued by Signal
Supervisor Freund in his letter to all Signal Maintainers
dated June 22, 1977.
(b) Following dates and times are made part of this claim.
August 6, 1977 8 hours.
August 7, 1977 5 hours 30 minutes
August 12, 1977 8 hours
August 17, 1977 6 hours
August 21, 1977 9 hours
Total of 36 hours 30 minutes
(c) Carrier now be required to compensate Signal Maintainer
!J. R. Yodden located at Glen Ellyn, Ill. at his applicable
overtime rate of pay for all time held on a standby basis
for the times and dates listed above.
Claims 1 through 7: Carrier file: 79-1-45.
Award Number 22787 Page 5
Docket Number SG-22603
"
Claim No. 8.
(a) On September 3, 4 and 5, 1977, the carrier violated the
current Signalmen's Agreement, particularly Rule 16,
concerning checking out and checking in for Signal
Maintainers as per instructions issued by Signal Supervisor
Freund in his letter to all Signal Maintainers dated June
22, 1977.
(b) Following dates and times are made part of this claim.
September 3, 1977 12 hours
September 4, 1977 12 hours
September 5, 1977 12 hours
Total of 36 hours
(c) Carrier now be required to compensate Signal Maintainer
T. R. Hobbs located at South Pekin, Illinois at his
applicable overtime rate of pay for all time held on a
standby basis and times listed above.
Claim No. 9
(a) On July 30, 31 and August 1, 1977, the carrier violated
the current Signalmen's Agreement, particularly Rule
16, concerning the checking out and checking in for
Signal Maintainers as per instructions issued by Signal
Supervisor Freund in his letter to all Signal Maintainers
dated June 22, 1977.
(b) Following dates and times are made part of this claim.
July 30, 1977 6 hours 10 minutes
July 31, 1977 20 hours 20 minutes
Aug. 1, 1977 7 hours
Total of 33 hours 30 minutes
(c) Carrier now be required to compensate Leader Signal
Maintainer W. G. Myers, located at South Pekin, Illinois
at his applicable overtime rate of pay for all time
held on a standby basis for the dates and times
listed
above.
Claims 8 and 9: Carrier file: 79-1-46.
Award Number 22787 Page 6
Docket Number SG-22603
"Claim No. 10
(a) On December 24, 25, 26 and 27, 1977, the carrier
violated the current Signalmen's-Agreement particularly,
Rule 16, concerning the checking out and checking in
for signal maintainers as per instructions issued by
Signal Suprv. Freund in his letter to all signal
maintainers dated June 22, 1977.
(b) Following dates and times are made part of this claim.
December 24, 1977 7 hours 45 minutes
December 25, 1977 24 hours
December 26, 1977 24 hours
December 27, 1977 7 hours '
Total of 62 hours 45 minutes
(c) Carrier now be required to compensate Leader Signal
Maintainer W. G. Myers, located at South Pekin,
Illinois at his applicable overtime rate of pay
for all time held on a standby basis for the dates
and times listed above.
Claim No. 10: Carrier file:79-1-47."
OPINION OF BOARD: Basis for these claims is the application of
Rule 16 (a) of the Agreement in effect between
the parties at the time of events germane to this dispute:
"SUBJECT TO CALL
16 (a) Employes assigned to regular maintenance duties
recognize the possibility of emergencies in the operation
of the railway, and will notify the person designated by
the management where they may be called. When such
employes desire to leave their home station or section
they will notify the person designated by the management
that they will be absent, about when they will return,
and, when possible, where they may be found. Unless
registered absent, regular assignee will be called."
Events cited in the claims occurred on various dates in June, July,
August, September and December of 1977. They followed the issuance, by
the Signal Supervisor, of a letter dated June 23, 1977, to "All Signal
Maintainers" which stated:
Award Number 22787 Page 7
Docket Number SG-22603
"Signal Maintainer check-out sheets have been provided
to the following locations;
Dispatcher's Office - Chicago
Dispatcher's Office - South Pekin
JB Tower -West Chicago
NY Tower -Nelson
Effective immediately, a record will be kept at the
above locations showing the time checked out and the
time checked back in. Maintainers will check out
with their designated check-out point as indicated
below. Each group will have at least one maintainer
available for call on nights and weekends. Therefore,
if all but one maintainer bas checked out in a group,
the remaining man will not be allowed to check out."
According to the Organization, the Claims herein are based
upon the application of such directive and are made by the Signal
Maintainers not allowed to "check out" as per the June 22, 1977,
directive, who thus considered themselves "subject to call."
The record reflects eloquent arguments by both parties -- by
the Organization (among other things) that the Claimants were on
"standby time" and entitled to compensation, and by the Carrier that
it must be able to sustain operations continuously and thus must have
access to qualified employes on an emergency basis at all times.
Neither argument is squarely on point with the issue before the Board.
What is, is whether or not the Carrier made a unilateral change to the
language and application of the appropriate Rule. We find in the
affirmative in that regard. Rule 16 (a) is neither vague and thus in
need of clarification, nor is it ambiguous and subject to various
applications. Apparently, what the Carrier sought to deal with was
the potential for all Signal Maintainers to register absent and it
thus be devoid of qualified employes on an emergency basis. We find
no such potential under this Rule; indeed, an affirmative obligation
rests upon such employes to ensure that the Carrier knows where all
may be found if they are away from their home stations. Essentially,
the Carrier has deprived the Claimants of this degree of flexibility,
presumably on the dates set forth herein. Such action exceeds the
restrictions set forth in Rule 16 (a) and thereby changes its application.
We suggest, however, that the extent of the Claims may be
violative of laws and statutes; we also conclude that no specific Rule
under the Agreement can be cited as applicable in this regard. What is
involved is a demand of punitive compensation for a loss of flexibility
Award Number 22787 Page 8
Docket Number SG-22603
for the Signal Maintainers who were not permitted to "check out" on the
various weekends cited in the claims. We remand this matter back to
the parties for 90 days, during which they are to endeavor to reach
an accommodation as to compensation for the improper restrictions
placed
upon
the affected employes. Failure of the parties to do so
within such period will result in this Board accomplishing this
responsibility.
FINDINGS: The Third
Division
of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this
Division
of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
The Agreement was violated to the extent set forth in the
Opinion; claims are to be disposed of as set forth in the Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
"4
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th day of March 1980.
L~I,-~
r
Dn
`~'ja~
I
( i: