NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number SG-22504
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE;
(Southern Pacific Transportation Company
( (Pacific Lines)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM; "Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of
Railroad Signalmen on the Southern Pacific Transportation
Company;
(a) That the Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Pacific Lines)
has violated the Agreement effective October 1, 1973, between the Company and
the employes of the Signal Department represented by the Brotherhood of Railroad
Signalmen and particularly Rule 25.
(b) That the claimants each be allowed and reimbursed for the costs
of noon meals incurred on the first day of the work week wherein each claimant
was assigned to work away from his home station and held out overnight.
Claimant Date Location Amount
D. W. White 3-14-77 Mapleton 3.40
3-21-77 Mapleton 3.55
4-4-77 Toledo 3.20
4-11-77 Toledo 3.45
4-18-77 Toledo 3.65
4-25-77 Toledo 3.25
E. M. Anderson 3-14-77 Mapleton 3.20
3-21-77 Mapleton 3.60
4-4-77 Toledo 3.50
4-11-77 Toledo 3.25
4-18-77 Toledo 3.40
4-25-77 Toledo , 3.40
C. A. McGraw 3-14-77 Mapleton 3.70
J. C. Haugen 3-14-77 Maple ton 3.45
4-4-77 Toledo 3.30
4-11-77 Toledo 3.60
4-18-77 Toledo 3.40
4-25-77 Toledo 3.55
Award Number 22809 Page 2
Docket Number SG-22504
"J. P. Walton 3-21-77 Mapleton 3.60
4-4-77 Toledo 3.25
4-11-77 Toledo 3.40
4-18-77 Toledo 3.55
4-25-77 Toledo 3.35
R. A. Paschelke 3-14-77 Mapleton 3.20
3-21-77 Mapleton 3.65
4-4-77 Toledo 3.45
4-18-77 Toledo 3.40
4-25-77 Toledo 3.35
P. C. Shields 3-14-77 Mapleton 3.50
3-21-77 Mapleton 3.25
4-4-77 Toledo 3.60
4-11-77 Toledo 3.50
4-18-77 Toledo 3.30
4-25-77 Toledo 3.20"
(Carrier file: SIG 108-71)
OPINION OF
BOARD: Claimants request reimbursement for the cost of noon
meal expenses incurred by them on the first day of
the work week they are sent out and remain away overnight from their home
station.
In pressing the claim, the Organization relies upon Rule 25 which
reads in pertinent part:
Rule 25 Held Out Overnight
"If meals and lodging are not furnished by the Company,
actual necessary expenses will be allowed until employe
is released at his home station."
The record reveals that there were some difference"mong the
carrier's divisions in application of the Rule. One of the carrier's
Division Supervisors issued revised instruction to the effect that coat of
first meal after leaving home station would not be reimbursed. In so doing,
he and the carrier relied upon the view that there was no recognizable
difference between the first (noon) meal away from home station in connection
with an overnight trip and a (noon) meal on a day in which the gang returns
to headquarters. The last day payment is not a matter before this Board.
Award Number 22809 Page 3
Docket Number SC-22504
As a matter of interest, it is noted that he returns home on the last day
and is not held out overnight on that day.
The Rule is very simple and straightforward. It provides a
qualifying heading that it applies to those who are held out overnight.
Once the employe qualifies under that heading, he is entitled to the
benefits thereunder. The argument of the carrier that the noon meal
need not be paid because the employe has not yet been held out overnight
might be applicable if payment were made immediately after the meal
because the possibility might exist that he wouldn't be kept overnight.
However, expenses are paid some time after the fact and when the held-outovernight qualification is
There is no qualifying language which would exclude the first meal as
desired by the carrier.
For the foregoing reasons and based upon the entire record
this Board must uphold the position of the Petitioners.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive
E
utive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 31st day of March 1980.