NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-22899
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
( Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company
( (William M. Gibbons, Trustee)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-8795)
that:
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerks' Agreement, particularly
Rules 39 and 44 when on June 21, 1977 Clerk Harold Coleman, Chicago, Illinois
was dismissed from the service of the Carrier as a direct result of an
investigation held in the office of the Carrier, Chicago, Illinois on
June 15, 1977.
(b) The Carrier shall reinstate Clerk Coleman with all rights,
benefits and privileges unimpaired and his personal record with the Carrier
shall be cleared with no reference to the charges brought against him on
May 24, 1977 or the discipline resulting therefrom.
(c) The Carrier shall now be required to reinstate Clerk Coleman,
with full pay for all time lost at the rate of the Time and Mileage Clerk
position, $1,121.19 per month, the position to which he was assigned at the
time of his termination.
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant was the occupant of position of Time and Mileage
Clerk in Carrier's Accounting Office in Chicago, Illinois.
On May 24, 1977, he was notified in part:
"You are hereby notified that an investigation will be held at
10:00 AM on Friday, May 27, 1977 in the office of Mr: J. J. Hartman
to develop the facts, discover the cause, and determine your
responsibility, if any, for your being insubordinate and for
uncourteoue deportment in violation of General Rule N and
Rule 14 of the Accounting Department Office Rules and Regulations.
The violation of these rules occurred on May 23, 1977 at 745 S.
LaSalle Street, Tenth Floor."
Award Number 22828 Page 2
Docket Number CL-22899
Following postponements, the investigation was conducted on
June 15, 1977. On June 21, 1977, claimant was notified of his dismissal
from service;
"You are hereby notified that your employment with this company
and all seniority rights held by you have been terminated as
of June 21, 1977, because of your being insubordinate and for
uncourteous deportment on Nay 23, 1977 in violation of General
Rule N and Rule 14 of the Accounting Department Office Rules
and Regulations."
Carrier's General Rule N and Rule 14 of the Accounting Department
Office Rules and Regulations, read in part;
"(N) Courteous deportment is required of all employees in
their dealings with the public, their subordinates
and each other.
Employees must not be;
,t ,t
(3) Insubordinate
(4) Quarrelsome or otherwise vicious.
(14) Courtesy - Employees are urged to be courteous in their
dealings with each other and/or those with whom they
contact as representatives of the Rock Island. The
importance of courtesy and consideration of others in
business relations is dictated by the principle that
good manners are important anywhere."
A copy of the transcript of the investigation conducted on June 15,
1977, has been made a part of the record. Upon careful review of the
transcript we find that none of claimant's substantive procedural rights
was violated.
In the investigation there were conflicts between the testimony
of claimant and that of his supervisor - the only two who testified.
It is well settled that this Board will not attempt to resolve conflicts
in testimony, weigh the evidence, or pass upon the credibility of wiLrtesses.
Award Number 22828 Page 3
Docket Number CL-22899
These functions are reserved to the Carrier. There was nothing to preclude
the Carrier from relying upon the testimony of claimant's supervisor even
though it was not corroborated by another witness.
Based upon the record before the Board, and considering claimant's
prior disciplinary record, we do not find Carrier's actions in dismissing
claimant from the service to be arbitrary, capricious or in bad faith.
FINDIMS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST: /A~ Acutdve Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of April 1980.