(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and ( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, ( Express and Station Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific ( Railroad Company



1) Carrier violated the Clerks' Rules Agreement at Janesville, Wisconsin commencing on November 8, 1976 when it failed and/or refused to fill the vacancy on Yard Clerk Position No. 52640 in its entirety.

2) Carrier shall now be required to compensate Employe J. Frierdich an additional eight (8) hours at the time and one-half rate of Position No. 52640 for November 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23 and 24, 1976.

OPINION OF BOARD: Carrier has been charged with violating the Clerks'
Agreement at Janesville, Wisconsin, by failing to fill
a vacancy on Yard Clerk Position No. 52640 in its entirety, on November 15,
16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23 and 24, 1976. The Rule in question, Rule 32, reads
in pertinent part as follows:










During the claim period, November 15 through November 24, 1976, a vacancy existed on Position 52640, Yard Clerk, located at Janesville, Wisconsin. The assigned hours of Position 52640 were 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., Saturday and Sunday rest days. Claimant occupied Position 51050, Demurrage Clerk. Janesville, Wisconsin, and his hours were 5:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m., Saturday and Sunday rest days. Both positions carried the same rate of pay.

To partially fill the vacancy the Carrier required the Third Trick Clerk to report for work four hours early. The Organization contends that the position should have been filled for eight hours and that Claimant should have been used to fill the position even though he was junior to the Third Trick Clerk who worked the position for four hours and junior to two other employes that the Carrier alleges would have been called before Claimant if Carrier cho hour assignment.

The Organization strongly contests Carrier's right to blank four hours of the assignment, however, they cite nothing in the controlling agreement which persuades us cites several awards regarding blanking of vacancies, but none seem to be applicable to the instant matter. Moreover, the case is replete with serious conflict in the basic facts pertaining to the situation. This Board is unable to resolve such factual conflicts. The claim will be denied.

        FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


        That the parties waived oral hearing;


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        Carrier did not violate Rule 32.

                    Award Number 22841 Page 3

                    Docket Number CL-22557

                    A W A R D


            Claim denied.


                        NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                        By Order of Third Division

ATTEST: w4o

        Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 16th. day of May 1980.