NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MS-22668
George S. Roukis, Referee
(James Shea
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Norfolk and Western Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "This is to serve notice, as required by the rules of
the National Railroad Adjustment Board, of my intention
to file an ex parte submission 30 days from the date of this notice covering
an unadjusted dispute between me and the Norfolk & Western Railroad involving
the question:
The claim of clerk, James Shea, for reinstatement with full
seniority from April 1, 1950 and back pay for all wages lost since June 10,
1977 when he was arbitrarily and capriciously removed from service by the
Norfolk & Western Railroad without just cause as required under the contract."
OPINION OF BOARD: This Board has carefully reviewed the methodically
developed documentary record, particularly, the
correspondence relating to this appeal and finds that Petitioner's letter
through Counsel, dated August 23, 1978 to the National Railroad Adjustment
Board's Executive Secretary expresses an unmistakable intent to file an
ex-parte submission that was timely and appropriate within the interpretative
context of our decisional law.
In Third Division Award 7813, we held in a conceptually analogous
case that:
"The declaration of intention to file a claim with the
Board, when received by the Secretary, establishes the
Board's jurisdiction."
The ruling is on point with the fact specifics herein, since the
aforesaid letter was received by the Board's Executive Secxetary on August 28,
1978, one day prior to the expiration of the nine (9) months time limits set
forth in Agreement Rule 38. Carrier's highest designated officer formally
denied the claim on November 29, 1977, thus establishing August 29, 1978 as
the. terminal date.
On the other hand, we are confronted with a clear and specific
self executing rule, that despite Petitioner's assertion, that it wasn't
uniformly enforced, requires an interpretive determination that is faithfully
consonant with its unambiguous and peremptory requirements and the principle
of Res Adjudicata.
Award Number 22849 Page 2
Docket Number MS-22668
Rule 17 (g) which is referenced hereinafter provides that;
"An employe absent on leave, or absent account of personal
sickness or disability, who engages in outside employment
without written agreement between Management and the
General Chairman will be considered out of the service
and automatically forfeits all seniority."
It is mandatory and invariant language that places upon an employe
a definitive obligation to secure such written acquiesence or suffer the
detrimental results that inevitably will follow non compliance. The record
is bereft of any evidence that Petitioner acquired written permission to
engage in outside employment and we are estopped from our statutorily
delimited appellate authority from rewriting this Rule to comport with
Petitioner's predicament.
We stated in Third Division Award 20371, a case involving the
same rule and the same fundamental issue that:
"The record is clear that Claimant did engage in full-time
outside employment; and there is no evidence anywhere in
the record, either during the handling on the property or
in the Petitioner's submission or rebuttal, to indicate
that a written agreement existed to allow Claimant to
engage in outside employment while on leave of absence."
We find this holding unequivocally dispositive of the substantive
issue before us and accordingly we are compelled to deny this claim.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the
parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon
the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
Award Number 22849 Page 3
Docket Number MS-22668
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
7/
!IV·
&zo~
Mecutive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 16th day of May 1980,