NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number NW-22273
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(New Orleans Public Belt Railroad
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier shall reinstate Bridgeman-Helper Frank J. Bertucci,
Jr. to service with all seniority, vacation rights, insurance coverage and
any other rights unimpaired
and
(2) Claimant Bertucci shall be reimbursed for all compensation loss
suffered by him as a result of being withheld from service commencing September 16, 1976 (System Fil
OPINION OF BOARD: The operative factual situation and respective positions
of the parties in this case were clearly and completely
set forth in our Award No. 22640 dated November 30, 1979.
In our Award No. 22640 we indicated that this Board would retain
jurisdiction of this dispute pending the outcome of Carrier's directed
compliance with the provisions of Rule 29 (a) which requires:
"(a) The employe involved, or his
Representative, will,
at his expense, select a physician to represent him and
the Railroad, at its expense, will select a physician to
represent it, in conducting a further physical examination.
If the two physicians thus selected shall agree the conclusions reached by them will be final."
The Board has now been advised by Carrier that they have made no
less than five (5) separate attempts - including the sending of a letter via
Certified U. S. Mail for which a signed receipt was received - to contact
Claimant Bertucci to arrange for the examination required by Rule 29(a).
To date, claimant has not responded to any of the communications directed
toward him in this regard. Carrier has, therefore, petitioned this Board
to dismiss this claim because:
Award Number 22944 Page 2
Docket Number W-22273
"Carrier has made every attempt to comply with Third
Division Order, Award No. 22640, Docket No. PEd-22273,
and Claimant has made no effort on his behalf to cooperate in fulfilling his part, in relation to Ru
29(a)."
From the record of events now before this Board, it is apparent
that claimant is attempting, for reasons known only to him, to prevent the
orderly progression ordered by this Board for the resolution of this dispute.
As we observed in Award No. 13941 (Dorsey) of this Division:
"There must be a termination to an adversary proceeding
and the parties bear the responsibility of protection
of their respective interests. The situation herein
presented is analogous to a party failing to appear at
a trial in a civil action set for a day certain, whereupon the court enters judgment on the pleading
ex parte evidence. ***."
Here likewise, Claimant Bertucci, on whose behalf this proceeding
was initiated and progressed bears the responsibility of protection of his
claimed rights. He cannot, with impunity, ignore Carrier's attempts to
arrange for the examination which is required to resolve this dispute.
Therefore, this Board now directs that Carrier will make one final
attempt via certified mail, return receipt requested, or by personal delivery
evidenced by receipt, to notify Claimant Bertucci to appear for an examina
tion on a day certain on which an appointment can be arranged with the
appropriate physician(s). If claimant fails to appear for and submit to
the scheduled examination, this Board will conclude that he is no longer
interested in pursuing this dispute and we will thereupon order that it
be dismissed with prejudice.
The retention of jurisdiction as stipulated in Award No. 22640 is
hereby repeated and renewed pending the outcome of the action-directed hereby.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing
Award Number 22944 Page 3
Docket Number NEW-22273
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That jurisdiction is retained in this Board as indicated in the
Opinion.
A W A R D
Claim remanded to the property for handling consistent with the
foregoing Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST: lA/ i ~~
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of August 1980.