NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number Mid-23102
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CIAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The dismissal of Trackman M. G. Gilley for alleged violation
of Rule 176 was without just and sufficient cause and wholly disproportionate
to the offense with which charged (System File B-1821).
(2) Trackman M. G. Gilley shall now be afforded the remedy prescribed in Article 11, Rule 91(b)(6)."
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant had been in Carrier's service about two months
as trackman, and at the time of the occurrence giving
rise to the dispute herein, was assigned to Tie Gang T-2-11, and was working
under the direction of Assistant Foreman, Steve Gunn. On August 17, 1978,
while working in Lindenwood Yard (St. Louis, Missouri) claimant was dismissed
from service for insubordination to Assistant Foreman Gunn.
At the request of the Organization, a formal investigation was
conducted on September 11, 1978. Following the investigation, claimant's
dismissal was affirmed on September 20, 1978.
Rule 176 of Carrier's Rules for Maintenance of Way and Structures,
reads in part:
"Employes who are negligent or indifferent to duty,
insubordinate ....quarrelsome, insolent or otherwise-
vicious ....will not be retained in the service." 'Without detailing the evidence adduced at the inv
September 11, 1978, suffice it to say that the Board finds substantial
evidence to support claimant's dismissal. Considering claimant's short
period of service, the discipline imposed was not excessive.
Award Number 22962 Page 2
Docket Number MW-23102
FIIDIMS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of August 1980.
ii
t, _