NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-22290
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
( Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPDTS:
(Central Vermont Railway, Inc.
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-8484)
that:
(1) Carrier violated the Agreement when commencing on November 1,
1976, and continuing thereafter, it required and/or permitted employees, who
are not covered by said Agreement, to cancel Manual Block System clearances,
which are train orders governing the movement of trains over the Winooski
Subdivision.
(2) Clerk E. E. Rochelesu shall now be allowed two (2) hours pay,
at the overtime rate of the Essex Jet. Mobile Agent position, for November 1,
1976, and for each subsequent day the violation occurred until February 9,
1977. Clerk H. G. Howard shall now be allowed two (2) hours pay, at the
overtime rate of the Essex Jet. Mobile Agent position, for February 10, 1977,
and each subsequent day the violation occurred until April 12, 1977, when the
violation was corrected.
OPINION OF
BOARD: Carrier has a single track running off the main line at
Essex Jet., Vermont, and continuing to Burlington,
Vermont, which is known as the Winooski Subdivision. For many years Carrier
maintained a first shift Operator's position at Essex Jet., Vermont, whose
duties included handling train orders covering train movements on the
Winooski Subdivision. Also headquartered at Essex Jet. was a Mobile Agent
who was responsible for the Agency work between Georgia, Vermont, and Bolton,
Vermont. On June 30, 1976 these two positions were consolidated. Effective
July 1, 1976, the Essex Jet. Mobile Agent was assigned the duties previously
performed by the Essex Jet. Operator, and continued to do so until October 31,
1976. On that date Carrier issued a new time-table which established a
Manual Block System for the Winooski Subdivision. The Manual Block System
established an M.B.S. clearance which replaced the Form H train order on the
Winooski Subdivision. The clearance authorized trains to occupy and use a
certain track between specific points.
Award Number 22978 Page 2
Docket Number CL-22290
Prior to initiation of the Manual Block System, conductors on
trains leaving Winooski Subdivision would annul their train orders with the
Essex Jct. Mobile Agent. After its initiation, enginemen on trains leaving
the Winooski Subdivision were required and/or permitted to cancel their
M.B.S. clearance by contacting train dispatchers direct via long distance
radio from Essex Jct., Vermont, by-passing the Mobile Agent. This procedure
was abandoned by Carrier effective April 12, 1977 when trains leaving
Winooski Subdivision began cancelling their M.B.S. clearance through the
Essex Jct. Mobile Agent.
On December 8, 1976, continuous claim effective November 1, 1976
was filed by the Organization on behalf of the incumbent of the Mobile Agent
position, based on the proposition that Manual Block System clearances are
train orders and should be handled in accordance with Article 76 of the
Working Agreement. Article 76 reads in part:
"ARTICLE 76
Handling Train Orders
76.1 No employee, other than covered by this agreement
and Train Dispatchers will be permitted to handle train
orders at telegraph or telephone offices where an operator
is employed and is available, or can be promptly located,
except in emergency in which case the employee will be
paid for the call."
Upon analysis of the entire record before us, we find persuasive the
Organization's argument that for purposes of Article 76.1 M.B.S. clearances
are the equivalent of train orders. See Awards 3-6863; 3-12702; 3-10435;
3-10534; 3-10699; 3-11297. It is important to note in that connection that
the territory in question is not CTC territory.
Based upon all of the foregoing we shall sustain the claim of the
period of violation November 1, 1976 to April 12, 1977. Carrier arguments
regarding appropriate damages were untimely raised and not joined on the
property; accordingly the "penalty" allegation cannot be considered by us.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
Award Number 22978 Page 3
Docket Number CL-22290
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
s4?
/e:5~
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 29th day of September 1980.