NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number
MW-23046
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way aaployes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company
STATENT OF CLAIti: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The dismissal of Trackman Leon Spencer was without just and
sufficient cause and was exceedingly disproportionate to the offense: with
which charged (System File
12-39 (78-13) J/C-4 (13)
- LS).
(2) Trackman L. Spencer shall be returned to service with
seniority and all other rights unimpaired, the charge levelled against
him be stricken from his record and he shall be reimbursed for all
wage loss suffered."
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant was employed as a trackman, with approximately
six years of service, and was assigned to Section
Force
8164
at Bradley, Florida.
Claimant marked off because of illness from November
14
through
November
22, 1977.
Upon his return to work on November
23,
the Roadmaster gave him a letter, and instructed him to take it to his personal
physician and return it to the Roadmaster. The Roadmaster heard nothing
further from the claimant and on November
28
he called the claimant's
doctor. Fe was informed that the letter had been completed by the
doctor, but claimant did not come back on November
23
and pick it
up as he indicated he would.
Claimant contacted the Roadmaster on December
5, 1977.-
and the
Roadmaster instructed him to return to work. Re was asked why he did not
return the letter from the doctor on November
23,
as instructed. Re said
his truck was broken down and he did not have any transportation, and
indicated that he did not have a telephone when asked as to why he did not
get in touch with the Roadmaster or Foreman to explain the situation.
Award Number 23024 Page 2
Docket Number MW-23046
On December 6, 1577, claimant was notified by the
Roadmaster:
"Account of you being absent from work on November 25,
28, 29s 30, and December 1 & 2 without proper excuses
you are hereby charged. with violation of Rule 17-B of
working agreement between the S.C.L. Railroad and the
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees.
Rule 17-B is as follows:
'An employee desiring to be absent from service
must obtain permission from his foreman or the
proper officer. In case an employee is unavoidably kept from work, he must be able to furnish
proof of his inability to notify his foreman or
proper officer.'
"You will be granted a hearing as per agreement with
the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Fhployees.
You will be notified of the date and time of this
hearing."
The hearing was scheduled for 1:00 P.M.., December
16,
1977,
and was conducted on that date with the claimant present and represented.
A copy of the transcript of the hearing has been made a part of the record.
Claimant was dismissed from service on January
4,
1978.
Substantial evidence was adduced at the hearing on December
16,
1977
showing that claimant was is violation of Rule 17-B of the applicable agreement, and also that he di
Roadmaster concerning the letter to be completed by his doctor.
The record also shows that claimant had been warned on eight prior
occasions concerning violation of Rule 17-B, and that he had previously been
disciplined for the same offense. Apparently the prior warnings and discipline did not have the desi
Based upon the entire record, there is no proper basis for this
Board to interfere with the discipline imposed.
l
- Award Number 23024 page
3
Docket Number
MW-23046
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the EMployes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21,
1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated,
A WAR D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD AWUS24ENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Execut ve Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of October 1980.