NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-23225
A. Robert Lowry,, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Mmployes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company
STATEMENT CF CLAIbt: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The dismissal of Laborer Donny Ray Williams for alleged
'insubordination' was without just and sui"Picient cause and on the basis of
unproven charges (System File MW-79-8-(B).
(2) Laborer Donny Ray Williams shall be reinstated with seniority,
vacation and all other rights unimpaired and, he shall be compensated for all
wage loss suffered."
OPINION OF BOARD: On December 7, 1978, Mr. D. R. Williams, the claimant, was
dismissed from the service of the Carrier for insubordination
when he failed to follow the instructions of his foreman. The Carrier charged
claimant with violation of Rule 801 of Rules and Regulations for the Government
of Maintenance of Way and Engineering Department Employes, reading in part as
follows:
"Enployes will not be retained in service who
are careless of the safety of themselves or
others, insubordinate, dishonest, immoral,
quarrelsome or otherwise vicious . . ."
Claimant requested and was granted a hearing under the rules of the applicable
Agreement. The hearing was held, after one postponement, on December 19, 1978.
Copy of the transcript of the hearing was made a part of the record. Claimant
was represented at the hearing by a representative of his choice as prescribed
in the Agreement. He had two witnesses testify in his behalf. A careful study
of the transcript reveals claimant received a fair and impartial hearing.
The question before this Board is whether claimant was insubordinate
and quarrelsome when he refused to respond and, return to work upon the first
instructions from his foremen. Claimant was part of a gang working on a switch
in the Pine Bluff gravity yard when it started to rain, he, along with others,
sought shelter. Apparently when the rain subsided the foreman gave instructions
to return to work and claimant refused to do so until after be was ordered to do so
the second time. When he did return an argument ensued and there was a question
Award Number 23077 page 2
Docket Number MW-23225
as to whether claimant threatened the foreman with a spike maul.
As a result of these developments the foreman ordered claimant
to leave the work scene and return to the tool house where he would receive
a dismissal letter. Claimant refused to leave voluntarily requiring the
foreman to obtain the assistance of the special agent to remove him from
the property. While several witnesses, including the claimant's, testified
they observed an argument taking place between claimant and the foreman,
none, other than the foreman, testified that claimant threatened the foreman. Claimant contended tha
were others under shelter from the rain at the time he was ordered out to
work. This was not refuted by the Carrier.
The Board finds the evidence clear that claimant was insubordinate
in that he failed to promptly follow the instructions of his foreman and
when he did so he was quarrelsome and argumentative by his own testimony.
We find him guilty of the charges.
Insubordination is a serious offense however in view of the
_ .entire record, we
feel claimant
ehou~d be
g~v
n
another chance,
We,
therefore,
award his reinstatement with full seniority and
all
other rights unimpaired --
but without back pay, and, with the further condition that this award be
made a part of his personal record.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21,
1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
I _
Award. Number 23077 Page 3
Docket Number MW-232.25
That the discipline imposed was excessive.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTKENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
1.zlw
ja./
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago Minoisj, this 21st day of November 1980.