NATIONAL RAILROAD
ADJBST4ENT
BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket N"ber MS-22953
(Michael Johnson
PARTIES 1n DISPUMs:
(Burlington Northern Inc.
STAT' .9T OF CLADI: "This is to serve notice, as required by the roles
of the National Railroad Adjustment Board, of my intention to file an ex pane submission on Apri
unadjusted dispute between me and the BTMLINGTObT NORTHERN INC., involving the following question:
Whether the termination of MICHAEL JOHNSON
from the BURLINGTON NORTBEftN INC. was
proper and in accordance with the agreement between BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. and
its employees."
OPINION OF BOARD: The record shows that claimant, who is the Petitioner,
entered the service of the Carrier on July 10, 1973.
In December, 1977, he was regularly assigned as an operator at Carrier's
Union Avenue Tower, Chicago, I111nois, with hours 2:45 PM to 10:45 PM.
The Carrier states that on December 28, 1977, it addressed and
sent to the claimant and operator G. B. Greene, who relieved claimant at
the end of his tour of duty, two notices advising them to attend investigations on January 4, 1978,
"Cicero.,
7114"
is
December 28, 1977
File W-&
Messrs. M. Johnson - Operator - Union Tower
R. Greene - Operator - Union Tower
Attend investigation in the Conference Room,
Freight House No. 9, 5405 west 26th Street,
Cicero, Illinois at 12:30 P.M. on Wednesday.
January 4, 1978, for the purpose of ascerta'ni ~ the facts and determining your respon
discourteous and disorderly conduct and improper transfer between Operators M. Johnson
Award 'tuber 23110 Page 2
Docket Number 115-22953
"and R. Greene, and with M. Johnson's
allegedly absenting himself from duty
without proper authority on December 8,
1977, Union Avenue Tower, Chicago,
Illinois.
Arrange for representative and/or witnesses
if desired in accordance with governing
provisions of pre-railing schedule rules.
Acknowledge receipt by affa~zing your
signature in the apace provided on copy
of this letter.
(Sgd) H. A. Turner
Traimaster
Acknowledge
Date
"Cicero, Illinois
December 28, 1977
File: W-n
Messrs. M. Johnson - Operator - Union Tower
R. Greene - Operator - Union Tower
Attend investigation in the Conference Room,
Freight House No. 9, 5405 West 26th Street,
Cicero, Illinois at 1:30 P.M.., Wednesday,
January 4, 1978, for the purpose of ascer
taimin
the facts and determining your
responsibility in connection with allegedly
improper transfer between Operators M. Johnson
and R. Greene on December 21, 1977, Pinion
Avenue Tower, Chicago, Illinois.
Award Number
23110
Page
3
Docket Number
MS-22953
"Arrange for representative and/or witnesses
if desired in accordance with governing
provisions of prevailing schedule rules.
Acknowledge receipt by affixing your
signature in the space provided on
copy of this letter.
(Sgd) B. A. Turner
B. A. Turner
Trainmaster
Acknowledge
The claimant did not attend the investigations, which were
conducted as scheduled, in his absence. On January 20,
1978,
claimant
was notified:
"Cicero. Illinois
January 20,
1978.
File: DT-E
SSA No. 334-44-6566
(DF 9841)
Mr. Michael Johnson
570
Locust Street
Elgin, Illinois 60720
This is to notify yon that effective
Sunday, January
22, 1978,
you are
hereby dismissed from the services
of the Burlington Northern Inc. for
violation of Rules
958
and 702(B) of
the Consolidated Code of Operating
Rules by being discourteous and disorderlp and for failure to make proper
transfer to your relief on December
8
and
21, 1977,
while assigned as Operator,
Award Number 23110 Page 4
Docket Number YS-22953
"Union Avenue Tower, Chicago, Illinois,
as developed at formal investigations
held on January
4,
19T8 of which you
were notified by letters addressed to
you on December 28, 19T7 and at which
you failed to appear.
Your past unsatisfactory record was
taken into account in assessing this
discipline.
Acknowledge receipt by affixing your
signature in the space provided on
copy of this letter and relinquish
any and all Company. property including
tz=a transportation issued you.
(Sgd) B. A. Turner
B. A. Turner
Trainmaster
Acknowledge
Date
cc: Messrs. R. P. De-aey
M. A. Sawyer
SPECIAL
DMIVERY
U. S. REGISTERED
MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED."
In progressing the dispute before the Board, the claimant requested
a hearing with the referee present. Such hearing was scheduled for 9:30 A.M.,
August 19, 1980, but was postponed at the request of the claimant because
of a representative not being present. The hearing was rescheduled for
1:00 P.M., November 19, 1980, at which time the claimant was present with
an attorney and another representative. The Carrier was also represented.
Award Number 23110 Page
5
Docket Number
MS-22953
In his submission to the Board and in the oral presentation at
the hearing on November
18, 1980,
the contention vas made that claimant
was not properly notified of the hearings which resulted in the termination of his services.
The Board has carefully reviewed the record in the dispute and
finds evidence that claimant did receive the notices of December
28, 1977;
that he did not attend the investigations, nor did he request a postponement.
The claimant's actions in this respect were at his peril. An employe nay
not deliberately refuse to accept a letter of charge, and then contend
that he was not properly notified.
Attempt has also been made by claimant to distinguish between
"investigation" and "hearing" as referred to in Rule 18. It is generally
accepted in railroad parlance that the words "investigation" and "hearing"
are synonymous. Further, there is no requirement in the Agreement that
an employe must sign for an investigation notice.
Carrier's Rules 702 (B) and
958,
referred to in the notice of
dismissal of January 20,
1978,
provide:
"702
(B) Employes must comply with
instructions from the proper
authority.
958.
Operators going off duty must
make a written transfer on the prescribed form of all undelivered
train orders and messages, instructions, including CTC instructions,
unfinished business, condition of
wires, position of train order
signals and overdue trains.
The operator going on duty must not
handle the train order signal,
train orders, or CTC control
machine until the transfer
has been completed. Each operator
must personally
sign
the transfer.
When shifts are not continuous, the
transfer will be made in the same
manner."
Award Number 23110 Page 6
Docket Number MS-22953
After reviewing the complete record in the case, and listening
to the presentations at the hearing on November
18, 1980,
the Hoard finds
that there was substantial evidence to support the discipline imposed,
which we find not to be arbitrary, capricious or in bad faith. The
claim will be denied in its entirety.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the
parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and
upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21,
1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMRT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATP=:
d , _ -___ .
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of January
1981.