NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-23284
(Brotherhood of
Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis
STATEMENT OF CLAIM; "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that;
(1) The, Carrier, without just and sufficient cause improperly disciplined
Trackman T. L. Hannah on charges that
(a) he was allegedly insubordinate on November 3, 1978 (System
File TRRA 1978-45);
(b) he was allegedly insubordinate on April 11, 1979 (System
File TRRA 1979-30).
(2) Trackman T. L. Hannah be reinstated with seniority and all other
rights unimpaired and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered including
overtime pay."
OPINION OF BOARD; Claimant was employed as a track laborer in Carrier's District
Gang No. 2, under the jurisdiction of Track Foreman John Davis
and Track Supervisor D. S. Stogner.
The Carrier contends that the claims as submitted to the Board by the
Organization were handled on the property as two separate claims, were improperly
combined in the submission to the Board, and, therefore, should be dismissed. The
Board finds
no proper basis for the complaint of the Carrier in this respect. The
combining of the claims by the Organization in one submission did not expand or
alter the claims, nor was the Carrier misled. See Awards 22480, 22499, 22611 and
22612.
On November 3, 1978, the gang was engaged in repairing track at the
south end of C.D. Yard, which had been damaged by a derailment. During the afternoon Supervisor Stog
the gang at the location until the repairs were made. The Carrier contends that
as a result of the Supervisor's instructions, which may have
required the
gang
to work overtime, claimant informed the Supervisor that he would not work overtime,
left the job site and later used vulgar and profane language to the Supervisor.
Award Number 23115
Docket Number M,T-23284 Page 2
On November 7, 1978, claimant was notified by the Assistant Chief
Engineer:
"You were removed from service about 1:30 P. M.,
Friday, November 3, 1978, pending the outcome of a
hearing that will be held at 9:00 A. M., Friday,
November 10, 1978, in the Conference Room in
building located at 9137 East Bremen Ave., St. Louis,
Missouri to determine the facts and your responsibility, if any, in connection with your being insub
at approximately 1:30 P. M., Friday, November 3, 1978
while working as Track Laborer.
"Arrange to be present. You are entitled to
representation and
witnesses in
accordance with Rule
#24 of the current Agreement between Terminal Railroad
and the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes."
By agreement the hearing was postponed and conducted on November 16,
1978. On November 29, 1978, claimant was advised that he was disciplined sixty
(60) days without pay, the suspension beginning on November 3, 1978.
On April 12, 1979, claimant was notified by the Assistant Chief Engineer:
"You were suspended from service on or about
7:30 A.M., Wednesday, April 11, 1979 pending the
outcome of a formal investigation (hearing) that
will be held at 1:30 P.M., Wednesday, April 18, 1979
in the Conference Room located in building at ';.·137
East Bremen Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri to determine
the facts and your responsibility, if any, in connection
with your being insubordinate to your Track Supervisor,
Donald S. Stogner, on or about 7:30 A. M., Wednesday,
April 11, 1979, while working as a Track Laborer in
C. D. Yard.
"Arrange to be present. You are entitled to
representation and witnesses in accordance with Rule
#24 of the current agreement between the Terminal
Railroad and the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way
Employes."
The hearing was held as scheduled and on April 26, 1979, claimant was
notified of his dismissal from the service.
Award Number 23115
Docket Number 19-23284 Page 3
Transcripts of the hearings conducted on each charge have been made a
part of the record. A review of the transcripts shows that none of claimant's
substantive procedural rights was violated. There was substantial evidence in
support of the charge in each case. There is no proper basis for the Board to
interfere with the discipline imposed by the Carrier.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carries and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of January
1981.