(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE :
(The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company



(a) The Carrier violated the Clerks' General Agreement when they administered discipline of thirty (30) days actual suspension against Claimant William D. Gipner as a result of hearing held on December 3, 1975.

(b) Claimant Gipner to be made whole for all wages and wage equivalents lost as a result of this discipline and his record be made clear of any discipline entry.

OPINION OF BOARD : Claimant was suspended from the service of the Carrier for
thirty (30) days after having been found guilty of being
insubordinate by reason of his failure to report to the office of Mr. W. C. Short,
Terminal Train Master, as instructed. Said discipline was assessed after inves
tigation properly held pursuant to sufficient notice.

The transcript of the investigation in the instant case reveals that Claimant was instructed to report to the office of the Train Master at 3:25 p.m. on November 25, 1975, and that, in fact, he did not report to the Train Master's office until approximately 4: a p.m. There is also evidence in the record that during the period of time between the time he was requested to report and when he did in fact report, the Claimant was on the phone performing the functions of his position. From a thorough review of the transcript, we are unable to conclude that the Carrier was incorrect in its finding that the length of time taken by Claimant to report as instructed was excessive and did, in fact, amount to insubordination. Given al us that the discipline assessed by the Carrier in the instant matter was excessive. Accordingly, we hold that Claimant should be compensated for all time lost in excess of a suspension of ten (10) days.





        That the parties waived oral hearing;


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        That the discipline was excessive.


                        A W A R D


        Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion .


                            NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                            By Order of Third Division


ATTEST:
            Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of January 1981.