NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-23066
Joseph A. Sickles, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CIAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-8832)
that:
1. Carrier violated the Rules of the Clerks Agreement, including but
not limited to Rule 44 of DP-451, when by Bulletin No. 101 of December 20, 1977
it abolished a five (5) day Position No. 1526 located at Franklin-Columbia,
Missouri to be effective January 8, 1978, and then by Bulletin No. 103 of
December 21, 1977 it advertised a six (6) day Position No. 1532 at Franklin,
Missouri with title of Agent-Telegrapher, and shown as a reinstated position.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate the incumbent of AgentTelegrapher Position No. 1532 a
eight (8) hours pay at the applicable one and one-half rate for each Saturday
commencing January 14, 1978 and for each Saturday thereafter, or until such time
as violation is corrected.
OPINION OF BOARD: The Organization cites a December 20, 1977 Bulletin No. 101
which abolished Consolidated Agent Position No. 1526, effective
January 8, 1978, and on the same date Bulletin No. 102 advertised a six (6) day
Agent Telegrapher Position No. 1532. The bulletin stated that the position was a
"reinstated position."
The Organization has referred to certain position abolishment in December
of 1974, and asserts that the December 19, 1977 bulletin is improper because it
advertises the six (6) day position as a "reinstated position." But, it asserts
that under the pertinent rules, the position cannot be considered as "reinstated."
Accordingly, claim was made for 8 hours' pay at the time and one-half rate for
Saturdays, as required by Rule 45.
The parties have made repeated reference to the "Note" to Rule 44, which
states:
Award Number 23158
Docket Number CL-23066 Page 2
"The above provisions of this Nile 44 pertaining
to 40 hours work per week do not apply to the
following positions, whose monthly rate compensates for six days per week - 211-2/3 hours per
month (212-1/3 hours per month effective January 1,
1973)."
The position which was abolished in December, 1974 was included in the Note to
Rule 44.
The Organization argues that when the Carrier abolished the position,
it removed that position from the exceptions to Rule 44, and thus an attempted
reinstatement of the position without paying the overtime compensation, as
required by Rule 45, is prohibited.
It is our view that Rule 18 of the agreement permits positions to be
reinstated. Clearly, Rule 18 contains certain restrictive provisions which apply
if the position is reinstated within ninety (90) days, however, that does not
prohibit the Carrier from reinstating the position after ninety (90) days have
elapsed.
We have, of course, confined our review of this matter to the dispute
as considered and handled on the property. References to Rule 59 (b) are accordingly misplaced in ou
We have considered the Organization's contentions at length; however we
are unable to find any rule of the agreement which lends support to the assertion
made by the Organization that abolishment of a position automatically removes
that position from the exceptions to Rile 44, if that position is reinstated as
permitted by Rule 18.
We have considered the Awards cited by the Organization in the oral
presentation to us, however we do not find that they are pertinent to the type of
agreement and record here before us. Accordingly, we will
deny
the claim.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds and holds;
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
Award Number
23158
Docket Number CL-23066 Page 3
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not Violated-
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of January
1981.