RATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number
CL-23340
Carlton R. Sickles, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station EVloyes
PARTIES TO DIM=:
The Western Pacific Railroad Company
SUM40T OF CLAM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GI,8992)
that:
1. The Western Pacific Railroad Company violated Rules
29
and 30
of the Agreement when it failed and refused to assign employe Donald Price to
Transit Clerk Position Z-0051 bat, instead, awarded it to junior employee
C. A. Thomas, and,
2.
The Western Pacific Railroad Company shall now be required
to allw Donald Price the difference in earnings lost because of the nonassigament from January
2, 1979
and continuing each day thereafter until
Rules
29
and
30
are complied With and is assigned to Position No. Z-0051,
Transit Mark.
OPINION C8 BOARD
:
Claimant was not promoted to the transit clerk position,
instead a junior employe by three-and-s-half years was
so promoted. The Carrier notified the claimant that its decision was made
not on seniority alone, but pursuant to Rule
29
on the basis of seniority,
fitness, and ability. The Organization asserts that the Carrier was arbi
trary and capricious in determining that the claimant's fitness and ability
were not sufficient.
The Organization raises the issue that Rules
29
and
30
must be
considered together which requires that the claimant be granted a thirty-day
appointment to the position on a trial basis.
Rules
29
and 30 provide as follows:
"PROMOTIONS, ASSIGRMUS, AND DISPLACMEBTS
RULE
29.
Employees covered by these rules
shall be in line for promotion. Promotion,
assignments, and displacements under these
rules shall be based on seniority, fitness
and ability; fitness and ability being sufficient, seniority shall prevail. When an
Award Humber 23249 page 2
Docket Humber CL-23340
"employee Junior to other applicants is assigned
to a bulletined position, the senior employees
making application will be advised the reason
for their non-assignment if they request such
information in writing and file it within 15
days from date of assignment.
NOTE: The word 'sufficient' is intended
more clearly to establish
the right
of the
senior employee to bid in a new position or
vacancy where two or more employees have
adequate fitness and ability."
FAILIME TO QM3FY
RILE 30 (As Revised 8/1/75)-
(a) Employees entitled to bulletined
positions or exercising displacement rights
will be alloyed thirty (30) working days in
which to qualifyp and failing, shall retain
all their seniority rights and may bid an
any bulletined position but may not displace
any regularly assigned employee.
An employee who fails to qualify on a
temporary vacancy may iiately return to
his regular position.
(b) Rsployaes will be given full. co.
operation of department heads and others in
their efforts to qualify.
(c) An employee may not be disqualified
before the expiration of thirty (30) working
days without a prior hearing being bold unless
the employee and the Division Chairman or General
Chairman waive such hearing.
(d) Employees who are disqualified under
this rule on other than temporary vacancies and
who have not bid for and been assigned to a bulletined position within thirty (30) days following di
as furloughed and subject to the provisions of paragraphs (b), (c) and (e) of Rule 40."
Award Nmber
23249
Page 3
Docket Number
CL-233I
We do not
conclude
from a reading of Rules
29
and 30 that in every
instance the senior employe soot be given a thirty-day trial period,, prior
to the promotion of a junior appointee to a position. Such an interpretation
would do violence to the clear language in Rule
29
which allows the carrier
to make a determination with respect to the fitness and ability of an applicant
for a position and thereafter mot appoint a person who is not qualified. Carried to its logical conc
a disruptive series of thirty-day trial periods of obviously roqa611fied persons
before a qualified person is put in the position.
The determination of fitness and ability is a managerial prrorogative
which will be sustained unless its action is shown to hate been arbitrary or
capricious.
The record does not show that the Carrier vas arbitrary and capricious
in making this determination. The Carrier, because of the nature of this position
involving complex accounting procedures has.. in the past, selected persons with
extended experience when promoting to the position of transit clerk. While
extended experience cannot be the only factor in determining fitness, it can
be a significant factor when the nature of a position is taken into consideration.
The positiens occupied by the alaimat have been mostly entry level., and at
the time of the bid an tote transit clerk position., he was still learning to be
a rate and division elwk, being classified as a junior in that position. It
is apparent that the alalmant vas still very much in the early stages of being
trained for the subsidiary position.
Since the record does not show that the Carrier's actions were
arbitrary or capricious and mines there is m absolute requirement that an
employe whose employment record does not establish fitness and ability be granted
a thirty-day trial period,9 the claim will be denied.
FIRDMICB: The Third Division of the Adjustment Hoard., upon the whole record
and all the evidence.. finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Amployes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Anployes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Acts as approved June
21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
aver the dispute involved herein; and
Award Barber 23249
Docket Nmber
Ci.-23340
That the Agreement was not. violated.
A W A R D
-Claim denied,
ATTEST:
Executive ear
Page 4
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJ'UB%VT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Wcago, ILlinoisj, this 31st day of March 1981.
Cm