XATIONAL RAILROAD AWUS240T BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number Q.-23279
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clarks,
( Freight Handlers Express sad Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company
STATEMENT C2' CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-8938) that:
(a) Carrier violated Rule Ll and others of the Agreement
on March 11, 1977 when they required and allowed the Yardmaster to bypass the Operator on duty and r
patcher.,
(b) Carrier now be required to compensate Mr. F. E. Thompson eight (8) hours pay at the pro rata
violation.
OPINION of
BOARD: Claimant, a cut-off clerk, properly filled a temporary
vacancy in an operator position for the second trick. on
March 11, 19'(7 at Fulton Yard, Richmond, Virginia. During the performance
of his duties on that date, claimant was required to leave his post to
deliver orders to a train on the eastbound main line. Prior to leaving,
the claimant specifically asked the Yardmaster if there were nay other
train moves, The Yardmaster gave him a "roundhouse to eastbound" move
sad no others. Claimant was absent for approximately six minutes. Upon
his return, claimant discovered the Yardmaster had directly contacted the
Train Dispatcher requesting a "Southern to the Eastbound Yard" move during
the six minute period. Claimant immediately filed a claim for eight hours
of pay at the rate of $56.58 per day alleging that the Yardmaster violated
the applicable agreement when he gave the "Southern to the Eastbound yard"
move to the dispatcher.
The issue here is not a question of liability since the Carrier
has conceded that, on March 11, 1977, claimant was entitled to handle
the "Southern to the 8sstboutd Yard" move. Instead, the issue is
what is the appropriate measure of damages, The Carrier has
vigorously argued that claimant is not entitled to any compensation since
he was on duty at the time. Furthermore, according to the Carrier, even
if the claimant is entitled compensation, the extent of his entitlement
is limited to actual damages pursuant to Rule 1 governing the scope of
work. Thus, the Carrier offered and paid claimant six minutes of wages
pro-rated from the daily rate of $56.68. On the other hand, the Organization urges us to award eight
is determined by Rule 41. Under prior settlements, on this property, the
union argues there is support for damages heater than the six minutes
paid by the (terrier.
Award Number 23318 Page 2
Docket Number CL-23279
Rule 41 of the applicable collective bargaining contract
states:
"No employs other than those covered by this
Agreement and Train Dispatchers will be permitted
to handle train orders at telegraph or telephone
offices where an employs covered by this Agreement is employed and is available or can be
promptly located, except in as emergency, in
which case the employs covered by this Agreemeat will be paid for the call."
The clear and unambiguous language of Rule
41,
end not Rule 1,
controls the instant controversy. Claimant was available to handle the
train move and he, indeed, expressly asked the Yardmaster if there were
any other train moves before leaving his post. Rule
41
also provides for
a call payment when the Carrier violates the rule. However., claimant is
not entitled to eight hours of pay. A review of the historical practice
on this property for settling similar disputes discloses that the proper
measure of damages is three hours of pay pro-rated from the daily rate.
Therefore, claimant shall be paid three hours of pay pro-rated from the
$56.58 daily rate less the six minutes of pay which he previously received from the Carrier.
FILINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employer involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employer within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21,
1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim sustained to the extent and in the manner set forth
is Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD AL17US51ENT BOARD
By Order of Third Divlsibn---_
f v
.,~\\
AT'T'EST: ~,~ ;. ~. ;
Executive Secretary
!,~
~Ipl
a
~ I~'i;1
!`.
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 1
9th
dry of June
1981
~~^ ~,~
d~,
C';ice- i.