Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employee PARTIES '110 DISPU'T`E:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:

(1) The dismissal of Trackman Andrew Liddell was without dust and sufficient cause and wholly disproportionate to the offense with which charged (System File C #61/D-2298-1). '

(2) Trackman Andrew Liddell shall be returned to service with seniority and all other rights unimpaired."

OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant had been in Carrier's service as trackman about
ten years. On March 19, 1979 he was dismissed from the
service for carrying a gun while on duty and on Company property on March 16,
1979·

The claimant requested a hearing in accordance with the provisions of the applicable Agreement. The hearing was conducted on March 28, 1979s following which the dispute was handled in the usual manner on the property, and, failing of settlement, was referred to this Board.

A copy of the transcript of the hearing conducted on March 28, 1979 has been made a part of the record. We have carefully reviewed the transcript of the hearing and find that none of claimant's substantive procedural rights was violated. Claimant was present throughout the hearing and wen represented. The hearing was conducted is a fair and impartial manner.

Rules 700 and 708 of Carrier's Operating Rules for Flployes in The Maintenance of Way and Structures and the Signal and Communication Department read:



                      Docket Number MW-23377


        Rule 708: "Employes are prohibited from having loaded or unloaded firearms in their possession while on duty except those employee authorized to do so in the performance of their dudes or those given special p


In the hearing conducted on March 28., 1979 them was substantial evidence that claimant did have a firearm in his possession while on duty on March 16~ 1979. Four employee so testified. Claimant did not come within the exceptions set out in Rule 708.

This Board has issued a number of awards upholding the dismissal of employee for being in the possession of firearms while on Company premises* See Third Division Awards 20199 and 20675; Second Division Awards 6938 and 7792. There is no proper basis for the Board to interfere with the discipline imposed by the Carrier in our present case.

        FILINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Boards upon the whole record and all the evidences finds and holds:


        That the portico waived oral hearing;


That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Acts as approved June 21., 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        That the Agreement was not violated.


                        A W A R D


        Claim denied. ,-


                              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                              By Order of Third Division


ATTEST:
      Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago Illinois this 1.4th day of Auguut lytil.