NATIONAL RAlLROAD AWMUMM BOARD
THIRD DIVISION *-1-Do.cket'.Nu;nber CL-23247
Rodney E. Dennis, Referee `
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, .
( fight Randle'ss RxPfess and Station Employes -
PARTIES 7n DISPuTE:
(The Atchison, Topeka and Santa, Fe Railway company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-8960) that:
(a) carrier violated the provisions
of
the current Clerks' Agreement
at Bakersfield.. California , January 4, 1979, when it notified Claimant P. G.
Molinaro that she would not be allowed holiday pay December 24 and 25, 1978,
after she had qualified for payment, and
(b) Carrier shall now compensate Claimant P. G. Molinaro for
eight (8) hours' pay at the rate of $53.4463 per day for December 24 and 25,
1978, as result of such violation of Agreement rules.
OPINION CP BOARD: Claimant P. G. Molinaro requests pay at the rate of
$53.4463 per day for December 24 and 25, 1978. Carrier
denied her pay for these two days because it alleged that she did not perform
work for Carrier on December 26, the day after the Christmas holiday.
The organization contends that claimant did perform service on
December 26 and, consequently, that she is qualified under Section 3 of the
December 28, 1967, National Agreement.
A review of the record of this case and previous awards both denying
and sustaining claims on this subject reveals that if employes perform any
service for which they have been paid, regardless of the amount of time spent,
this Board has decided that petitioners satisfied the requirement of having been
compensated on the day before or the day after a holiday. In the instant
case, claimant worked 30 minutes on December 26. By so doing, she met the
requirements for being paid for December 24 and 25. (see Second Division
award 7174 and awards referenced therein).
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
y r 4
Award Number
23414
Page
2
Docket Number
M-23247
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act., as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has Jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD AWUS24ENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois,, this 3rd day of November 1981.
/~
;'or _ _~'i \
;W