NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-23338
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood (GL-8961) that:
CLAIM N0. 1 (File Balt.-2061), Carrier file CG-9262)
(a) The Carrier violated terms of the Clerks General Agreement,
October 28, 1974, when they charged Mr. Bernard T. Kerrigan
with a days vacation and his holiday pay is to be computed
into his monthly rate, and
(b) Mr. Bernard T. Kerrigan, incumbent of position E-23, Debt.
Serv. Clerk, rate $1277.21 per month should now be compensated
for the one day vacation charged against him for October 28,
1974, or allowed 8 hours at the pro rata rate of $1277.21 per
month.
CLAIM N0. 2 (File Balt.-2091, Carrier file CG-9295)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay Geraldine S. Bonnuccelli during the month of
Dec. 1974, and
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Geraldine S. Bonnuccelli's
pay for Dec. 1974 and allow her $56.88 in addition to any
other pay due her for this period.
Award Number 23450 Page 2
Docket Number CL-23333
CIA IM N0. 3 (File Balt.-2092, Carrier file CG-9296)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay LeRoy C. Behrens during the month of Dec. 1974,
and
(b) The Carrier should now recompute LeRoy C. Behrens pay for
Dec. 1974 and allow him $56.88 in addition to any other pay
due him for this period.
CLAMNO . 4 (File Balt.-2093, Carrier file CG-9297)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay Robert J. Bonnuccelli during the month of Dec. 1974,
and
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Robert J. Bonnuccelli's pay for
Dec. 1974 and allow him $58.70 in addition to any other pay due
him for this period.
CLAIM N0. 5 (File Balt.-2094, Carrier file CG-9298)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement of the BRAC when
they did not properly pay George J. Wilhelm during the month of
Dec. 1974, and
(b) The Carrier should now recompute George J. Wilhelm's pay for
Dec. 1974 and allow him $56.70 in addition to any other pay due
him for this period.
CLAIM (File Balt.-2095, Carrier file CG-9299)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did
not properly pay Robert L. Taffe during the month of Dec. 1974.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute pay for Dec. 1974, and allow
him $58.70 in addition to any other pay due him for this period.
(File Balt.-2096, Carrier file CG-9300)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay Norman W. Stewart during the month of Dec. 1974,
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Norman W. Stewarts pay for
Dec. 1974 and allow him $59.60 in addition to any other pay
due him for this period.
Award Number 23450 Page 3
Docket Number CL-23338
CLAIM
N0.
8 (File Balt.-2097, Carrier file CG-9301)
(a) The carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay Doris A. Eldridge during the month of Dec. 1974,
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Doris A. Eldridge's pay for
Dec. 1974 and allow her $56.87 in addition to any other pay due
her for this period.
CLAIM
N0.
9 (File Balt.-2098, Carrier file CG-9302)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay Carmelo J. Liberto during the month of December
1974.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Carmelo J. Liberto's pay
for December 1974 and allow him $58.70 in addition to any other
pay due him for this period.
CLAIM N0. 10 (File Balt.-2099, Carrier file CG-9303)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay Joseph F. Ebert during the month of Dec. 1974, and
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Mr. Joseph F. Ebert's pay for
Dec. 1974 and now allow him $58.70 in addition to any other pay
due him for this period.
CLAIM
N0.
11 (File Balt.-2100, Carrier file CG-9304)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay Marjorie E. Branch during the month of Dec. 1974.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Marjorie E. Branch's pay for
Dec. 1974 and allow her $51.24 in addition to any other pay due
her for this period.
CLAIM
N0.
12 (File Balt.-2211, Carrier file CG-10075)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement by not paying
W. E.
Harrigan properly for the montn of July, 1975, and
(b) The Carrier should now recompute
W. E.
Harrigan's pay for
July, 1975 and allow him $60.53 in addition to any other pay
due him for this period.
Award Number 23450 Page 4
Docket Number CL= 3338
CLAIM No. 13 (File Balt.-2257, Carrier file CG-10430)
(a) The Carrier. violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay George J. Wilhelm during the month of December, 1975.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute George J. Wilhelm's pay for
December, 1975 and allow him $64.72 in addition to any other
pay due him for this period.
CLAIM N0. 14 (File Balt.-2258, Carrier file CG-10431)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay Joseph F. Ebert during the month of.Dec. 1975.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Joseph F. Ebert's pay for
December 1975 and allow him $64.72 per addition to any other
pay due him for this period.
CIAIM N0. 15 (File Balt.-2259, Carrier file CG-10432)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly. pay Robert J. Bonuccelli during the month of December,
19 75.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Robert J. Bonuccelli, pay
for December, 1975 and allow him $64.72 in addition to any other
pay due him for this period.
CIAIM NO. 16 (File Balt.-2260, Carrier file rG-10433)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical AgtAment when they did not
properly pay
R. E.
Sutherland during the month of December, 1975.
(b) The Carrier shoud now recompute
R.
B. Sutherland pay for
Dec. 1975 and allow him $62.70 in addition to any other pay
due him for this period.
CIAIM t,0. 17 (File Balt.-2261, Carrier file C6,10434)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay Edward M. Keiser during the month of Dec. 1975, and
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Edward M. Keiser's pay for
December 1975, and allow him $69.92 in addition to any other pay
due him for this period.
Award Number 23450 Page 5
Docket Number CL-23338
CIA IM N0.
18 (File Balt.-2262, Carrier file CG-10435)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did
not properly pay Robert H. Powers during the month of
December, 1975.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Robert H. Powers pay for
Dec. 1975 and allow him $64.72 in addition to any other pay
due him for this period.
CLAIM
N0. 19 (File Bait.-2263, Carrier file CG-10436)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did
not properly pay Ms. Doris A. Eldridge during the month of
December, 1975.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Ms. Doris A. Eldridge pay for
December, 1975 and allow her $62.71, in addition to any other
pay due her for this period.
CLAIM N0. 20 (File Balt.-2266, Carrier file CG-10443)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay Danny
L.
Smith during the month of December, 1975.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Danny L. Smith's pay for
December 1975 and allow him $73.80 in addition to any other
pay due him for this period.
CIA ~I,
N0. 21 .(File Balt.-2267, Carrier file CG-10444)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay Norman W. Stewart during the month of December, 1975.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Norman W. Stewarts' pay for
December 1975 and allow him $65.71 in addition to any other pay
due him for this period.
CIAIM N0. 22 (File Balt.-2541, Carrier file CG-11435)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay R. H. Powers during the month of-July 1976.
The Carrier should now recompute R. H. Powers pay for July 1976
and allow him $72.10 in addition to any other pay due him for
this period.
Award Number
23450
Page
6
Docket Number
CL-23338
-CIAIM N0. 23 (File Balt.-2561, Carrier file CG-11708)
(a) The Carrier, violated the Clerical Agreement when they did
not properly pay James G. Prather during the month of
September, 1976.
(b) The carrier should now recompute James G. Prather's pay for
September, 1976 and allow him $75.17 in addition to any other
pay due him for this period.
CIA IM N0. 24 (File Balt.-2566, Carrier file CG-11764)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay John McGee during the month of September, 1976.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute John McGee's pay for September
1976 and allow him $76.14 in addition to any other pay due
him for this period.
CIA EI N0. 25 (File Balt.-2575, Carrier file CG-11840)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay L. E. King during the month of September 1976.
(b) The Carrier 'should now recompute L.E_ King's pay for September
1976 and allow him $72.10 in addition to any other pay due him
for this period.
CLAIM N0. 26 (File Balt.-2576, Carrier file CG-11841)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreletient when they did not
properly pay E. P. Kipps during the month of September 1976.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute E. P. Kipps' pay for September
1976 and allow him $73.19 in addition to any other. pay due him
for this period.
CIA IM N0. 27 (File Balt.-2577, Carrier file CG-11842)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay Ann R. King during the month of September 1976.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Ann R. King's pay for September
1976 and allow her $69 .93_in addition to any other pay due her
for this period.
Award Number
23450
Page 7
Docket Number
CL-23338
CLAIM N0. 28 (File Balt.-2583, Carrier file CG-11845)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did
not properly pay John G. Baublitz, Jr., during the month
of November, 1976
(b) The Carrier shall now recompute John G. Baublitz's pay for
November, 1976 and allow him $169.62 in addition to any
other pay due him for this period. .
CIA 114 N0. 29 (File Balt.-2602, Carrier file CG-11946)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement and others when
they
did not
properly compensate Mr. G. W. Ball ID-2154811
during the month of Dec. 1976, and
(b) The Carrier should now recompute G. W. Balls wages for the
last week of Dec. 1976 and the first week of Jan. 1977 to
include Dec. 25, 1976 Xmas and now allow him one (1) day
at the rate of $79.96 in
addition to
any other earnings
due him for this period.
CLAIM N0. 30 (File CC-194, Carrier file .CG-11946)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay Howard E. Bern during the month of September 1976.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Howard E. Hern's pay for
September 1976 and allow him $76. 15 in addition to any other
pay due him for this period.
CLAIM N0. 31 (File CC-195, Carrier file CG-11780)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay C. 0. Reynolds during the. month of Nov., 1976.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute C. O. Reynolds pay for Nov.
1976 and allow him $94.70 in addition to any other pay due
him for this period.
CIA IM N0. 32 (File CC-196, Carrier file CG-11781)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay John Hathias,_Jr., during
L:"
moneh of Sept. 1976.
(j) The Carrier should now re-compute John Mathias, Jr., pay for
Sept. 1976 and allow him $78.12 in addition to any other pay
due him for this period.
Award Number
23450
Page
8
Docket Number
CL-23338
MAIM N0. 33 (File CC-197, Carrier file CG-11782)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they
did
not
properly pay W. D. Nelson during the month of Nov., 1976.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute W.
A.
Nelson's Pay for
Nov. 1976 and allow him $79.96 in
addition to
any other pay
due him for this period.
(File CC-198, Carrier file CG-11870)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement and others when
they
did not
properly compensate Mr. W. T. Clements during
the month of Dec. 1976
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Mr. W. T. Clements wages
for Dec. 24 and Dec. 25, 1976 and now allow him $148.45
in addition to any other pay.due him for this pay period.
LIARL
NO
35 (File CC-199, Carrier file CG-11871)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement-and others when they
did not properly compensate Mr. C. 0. Reynolds during the month
of Dec. 1976.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Mr. C. 0. Reynolds wages for
Dec. 24 and Dec. 25, 1976 and now allow him $148.45 in
addition
to any other pay due Mr. Reynolds for this pay period.
C~.~ (File CLIC- 176, Carrier file CG-11947)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement-when they did not
properly pay William Martin during the month of Dec., 1976.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute William Martins pay for
Dec., 1976, and allow him $152.40 in addition to any other
pay due him for this period.
CLAIM
N0. 37
(File CLIC-177, Carrier file CG-12868)'
(a) The Carrier violated terms of the BRAC Clerical Agreement and
others when they did not properly compensate'Mr. D. L. Darling
for two (2) days as is provided for in Article 1, Para. E and F
of the BRAC rules, and
(b) Mr. D. L. Darling, incumbent of position E-3 Supervisor, rate
$1619.21 per month should now be allowed two (2) additional
days vacation or compensation in lieu of because of this
violation based on his monthly rate of $1619.21 per month.
Award Number 23450 Page
9
Docket Number CL-23338
CLAIM N0. 38 (File CLIC-181, Carrier file CG-12265)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerical Agreement when they did not
properly pay Mr. P. K. O'Donnell during the month of Dec. 1976.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute Mr. 0'lbnnells pay for
December 1976 and allow him $75.12 in addition to any other pay
due him for this period.
CLAN
No. 39 (File 504-2780, Carrier file CG-12581)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerks' Agreement when they did not
properly pay J. D. Myers during the month of April, 1977.
(b) The Carrier shall now recompute J. D. Myers' pay for April, 1977
and allow him $82.11 in addition to any other pay due him for
this period.
CLAIM N0. 40 (File 666-454, Carrier file CG-9519)
(a) That the Carrier violated the terms of the General Agreement and
Memoranda thereto, when for the pay period of December 14 through
December 27, 1974, which was received on January 10, 1975, it
failed and refused to adequately compensate Clerk, J. J. Heiert,
the incumbent of the Position of Division 'Storekeeper, CE-1,
Rate 1101.27 at Stevens, Ky. and,
(b) That the Carrier further violated the Agreement by failing to
adjust this matter during the pay period of December 28, 1974 throa*
January 10, 1975, which was received on January 24, 1975, and
(c) That the Carrier shall now arrange to allow Clerk Heiert one
day's pay at the daily rate of $52.45 in addition to all other
earnings, which is the amount he would have earned had he been
properly compensated under the terms of the Agreement.
CLAIM N0. 41 (File Chgo.-666, Carrier file CG-12173)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerks' Agreement when they did not
properly pay Patrick Joyce during the month of December, 1976.
(b) The Carrier shall now recompute Patrick .Joyce's pay for
December, 1976 and allow him one (1) day'.: pay at the rate of
$1438.07 per month in addition to any other pay due him for this
period.
Award Number
23450
Page 10
Docket Number
CL-23338
CLAIM N0.,.42 (File HV-820, Carrier file CG-9293)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerks' Agreement when they did not
properly pay Harold L. Williams during the months of
December 1972, November 1973, December 1973, and September
1974.
(b) The' Carrier shall now recompute Harold L. Williams' pay
and allow him $47.19 for December 1972, $47.21 for November
1973, $49.45 for December 1973 and $51.44 for September 1974.
CLAIM N0. 43 (File 504-2824, Carrier file CG-13387)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerks' Agreement when it failed to
properly compensate G. D. Hawk.for the month of December, 1977.
(b) That the Carrier shall now recompute G. D. Hawk's pay for
December, 1977 and allow him an additional $143.31 in addition to other pay for this period.
CLAIM
N0.
44 (File Balt.-3156, Carrier file CG-14388)
(a) The Carrier violated the Clerks' Agreement when they did not
properly pay J. D. Iden during the month of
Nov.,
1978.
(b) The Carrier should now recompute J. D. Idens pay for Nov.,
1978 and allow him $79.18 in addition to any other pay due
him for this period.
OPINION OF BOARD: This case consists of a group of forty-four claims brought
by monthly rated employes under the applicable agreements in
effect between the organization and the Carrier. Each Claimant is asking for
one or more days pay pro rated from the monthly rate for vacation pay when a
holiday fell within the Claimant's vacation period between 19714 and
1978.
The facts are not in dispute. When a holiday occurred during a
claimant's vacation period, the Carrier included the holiday in the Claimants'
total number of vacation days. The Claimants received their usual total monthly
salary. In some instances, the Carrier computed their salary payments by using
the number of work days plus the holiday. At other times, the Carrier computed
their twice monthly salary payments by using only the number of working days.
Regardless of the method of computation, the Carrier paid the Claimants their
total monthly salary due under the agreement. Holiday pay is already included
in the Claimants' salary. The issue is whether a Claimant is entitled to an
additional day's pay for a holiday which is also counted as a vacation day when
a holiday falls within the Claimant's vacation period. If an additional day of
pay is due, each Claimant would be receiving more than his monthly salary.
We recently considered this identical issue based on similar facts
Award Number
23450
Page 11
Docket Number
CL-23338
between these same parties in Third Division Award No.
22634
(Sickles) where
we found that under the September 1,
1949
Agreement, the Claimant was entitled
to
1/21
of his monthly salary (since the particular month involved contained
twenty-one working days). The carrier concedes that Award
22634
concerned a
claim identical to the forty-four claims herein but argues that the award was
palpably erroneous and should not control the disposition of these claims.
In order to bring predictability to the relationship between the Carrier
and its employes, we are bound by precedent interpreting the applicable agreements unless the challe
erroneous. Third Division Awards No.
4788
(Robertson); No.
11480
(Hall); No.
15740 (Kenan) and No.
22038
(Roukis). Therefore the burden is on the Carrier
to show that Award
22634
was an obvious error and if the Carrier does not sustain
its burden, then Award
22634
fixed the rights of the parties in this controversy.
Third Division Award No.
7252
(Wyckoff).
In support of its argument, the Carrier essentially argues that Avard
No.
22634
lacks a firm foundation because Article II of the
1954
National vacation
Agreement expressly states that holidays falling during an employe's vacation
period should be counted as work days. Also, according to the Carrier, each
Claimant received his full monthly salary and there is no contract provision
justifying an additional day's pay over and above the monthly rate.
The Organization urges us to affirm Award No.
22634
not only because
we have an obligation to follow precedent under the doctrines of res judicata
and stare decisis but also because the September 1,
1949
Agreement is an
adequate justification for the decision. Article I, paragraphs (a) and (e)
refer to vacation days as work days which implies that holidays should be
excluded. In addition, Sections Three and Four of that Agreement provides
for the computation of pay based only on the number of work days in a given
month implying, as we said in Award No.
22634,
that the formula creates a
" .basis for payment and there may very well be a monthly fluctuation."
Furthermore, the Organization contends that pursuant to Paragraph Seven of
the
1949
Agreement, a monthly rated employe shall not receive any less compensa
tion during the year than if he bad been paid on a daily basis. A daily rated
employe would have been paid for both the holiday and vacation day or not
charged with a vacation day for a holiday falling within his vacation period.
After carefully considering all its arguments, we do not concur
with the Carrier that Award No.
22634
is palpably erroneous. The Carrier
places primary reliance on Article II of the
1954
National Vacation Agreement
which we note was cancelled by a subsequent agreement. Though parts of Article
II are currently incorporated into Article III of the
1972
Agreement, they
deal with extensions of the vacation period which are not at issue here.
Thus, we must look, as we did in Award No.
22634,
to the
1949
Agreement.
Monthly rated employes would be in a disadvantageous position when compared
to daily rated employes unless they were compensated zor a vacation day which
was also a holiday. Also, the computation formula does not preclude a monthly
zewed -,r'=ye from receiving more than his monthly salary during a given month.
~~c
Award No.
22634
is within the realm of reasonableness, we are bound
to follow that precedent. As we ruled in Award No.
22634,
our decision is
limited to this property.
Award Number 23450
Docket Number ;L-23338 Page 12
To avoid confusion regarding our remedy, the Claimants in each of
the forty-four claims shall be paid one additional day at the appropriate pro
rata rate for each holiday included as a "vacation day". On this property,
holidays are not to be included as "work days" in determining the number of
"work days" in a month.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties
to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated,
A id A R D
Claims are sustained in accordance with the Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest: ,, =-----.,~
E~cecutive Secretary c C,_
I ':~
E
n.
Dated at Chicago, Illinoisq this 8th day of December-1981h_.'.
V
~u- .