~,oa.
_ 1fATI0NAL RAILROAD AWUS24ENT BOARD
Award Number
23523
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number
CL-23815
Paul C. Carter, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway# Airline and Steamship Clerics,
Freight Naadlers, Express and Station Hmployes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Atchlsoa, Topeka and Seats Fe fti3.vuy Company
3TAMCNT OF Q.A>bt: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-9345)
test:
(s) Carrier violated ate. continues to violate the rules
of the current Clerks' Agreement at Los Angeles when it wrongfully discharged
Ice.
Richard Brown., and
(b) Carrier shall now return Mr. Brown to service and shall
oaspensate him for all wage loss
commencing
August
9, 1979,
and continuing
so leap as he is wrongfully held out of service, and
(c) In addition to the compensation far lost napes the Carrier
shall pry ten per cent (10%) interest campoanded annually on all wages withheld from Mr. Hrwn.
OPINION
OF
BOARD: Claimant had a seniority date of April
6, 1976
on the
Manger Soles ate. Service, Seniority District, working
out of Los Angeles and at the time of the occurrence giving rise to the dispute herein, vas the regu
No.
6109,
assigned to work
7:45
1.M. to
4:30
P.M. Wednesday,, Thursday
sue.
Friday and
7:00
A.M. to
3:45
P.4 Saturday cad Sunday.
On July
12, 1979,
claimat was notified by the Regional Sales
Mnanger:
"You are hereby notified to attend
formal
investigation la Santa Fe Building, Conference Roam
312,
at
9:00 M,
Tuesday, July
24, 1979,
concerning your allegedly unauthorized access to company records at
apparoodmte7y
3:20
IM, July
8, 1979
so as to determine
facts and pleas responsibility, if say, involving possible violation of Rules
2, 15, 16, 17
sad
20
of the
General Rules far the Guidance of Rsployes, Form
2E26
Standard.
You may arrange far representation is line with
the provisions of Agreement or Schedule governing your
working condition sad. you may likewise arrange for the
attendance of say desired witnesses."
Award Number
23523
Page 2
Docket Number
CL-23815
The investigation vas postponed and conducted on August 2, 1979·
The rules cited in the notice of July 12,
1979,
were quoted in the iavastigatioa and will not be repented here.
A copy of the transcript of the investigation has been lade s
pert of the record. We have carefully examined the transcript nod find that
nose of claimant's substantive procedural rights was violated. The charge
against claimant vas sufficiently precise to enable
claimant
sad his representative to prepare a defense.
In the investigation, there vas substantial evidence that claimant
left his desk is his assigned work locations obtained bays that were kept by
a snperrl.sor, went to n different locations unlocked the filing cabinet which
contained personal retards nod other personal and confidential materials and
vas observed by two witnesses at about
3:20 Me
searching personal records
without authority to do so.
It was also brought out in the investigation that claimant requested
one of the supervisory employes who observed him searching the records, not
to repaint the matter.
Based on the entire record, there is no proper basis for this
Board to interfere with the discipline imposed by the Carrier.
F11m111G3: Rye Third Division of the Adjustment Board., upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier nod Employee within the manning of the Rnilvsy
Labor Act, as approved June
21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdia-t;k, over
the dispute involved herein; nod
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
ATTfiST:
zz 1W/0
Executive Secretary
CEIIC
.. . r ___
0
Clfico - ~~'1
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJl13IV 11T HOAX
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 26th day of February
1982.