NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-23851
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Kentucky and Indiana Terminal Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-9339)
that:
1. Carrier violated the agreement, when it acted in an arbitrary,
capricious and discriminatory manner and dismissed from service, vacation
relief clerk, Mr. Wilbert Hayes, III.
2. Carrier shall, because of this violation:
(a) Promptly restore Mr. Hayes to duty with seniority, vacation and
other rights unimpaired.
(b) Pay Mr. Hayes the amount of wages he would have earned absent
the violative action, less outside earnings, commencing with Friday, August 10,
1979.
(c) Pay Mr. Hayes any amount he might incur for medical or surgical
expenses far himself or dependents, to the extent that such payments would have
been paid by Travelers Insurance Company under
Group
Policy No. GA-23000 and,
in the event of death of Mr. Hayes, pay his estate the amount of life insurance
provided for under said policy. In addition, reimburse him for premium payments
he may have made in the purchase of substitute health, welfare and life
insurance.
(d) Pay Mr. Hayes interest at the statutory rate for the State of
Kentucky for any amounts due under (b) above.
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant was regularly assigned to the 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
L. S. Junction Interchange Clerk position. At about 10:50 P.m.
on July
16,
1979, he telephoned the second shift L. S. Junction Interchange
clerk, William Joyce, and advised Mr. Joyce he would be 10 or 15 minutes late.
At approximately 12:30 a.m. Claimant again called Mr. Joyce and stated that he
had overslept and was then on his way. He arrived at work at 12:55 a.m. He
did not report his delay in reporting to his supervisor. On July 27, 1979,
Claimant was notified:
"Arrange to be present in the Agent's office at 9:00 a.m.,
Thursday, August 2, 1979, for an investigation.
This investigation is being held to determine the facts
and your responsibility, if any, for failure to show for
Award Number 23823 Page 2
Docket Number CL-23851
your assignment at the appointed time on July
26, 1979.
You were scheduled to work 11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m.
Interchange Clerk
at L. S. Junction on this date.
If you desire a representative or witnesses arrange to
have them present."
The notice was signed by the Superintendent. The investigation was
held as scheduled. A copy of the transcript of the investigation has bean made a
part of the record. On our review of the transcript of the investigation, we
find that none of Claimant's substantive procedural rights was violated. The
investigation was conducted in a fair and impartial manner. In the investigation
the Claimant gave as the reason for the delay in reporting was the illness of
his woman. He did not deny that he failed to report at the appointed time but
acknowledged that he was 1 hour and 55 minutes late.
The regular second shift interchange clerk testified that Claimant
called him about 10:50 p.m. and said he would be a little late; that he called
again at 12:30 a.m. and said he was on his way, and the only explanation
Claimant gave was that he overslept.
Claimant, in the investigation, for the first time, stated that his
woman had been stricken with diabetes; that he worked all night and took care of
her during the day, and that he simply overslept.
Claimant's prior record with respect to protecting his assignment and
being late is far from satisfactory. He was charged with such offenses or
cautioned on at least seven different occasions. He was the Claimant in Third
Division Award No. 21355, wherein the Board saw fit to restore him to his former
position with seniority rights unimpaired, but without pay for time lost while
out of the service - some two and one-half years.
Claimant's actions in the present case, coupled with his prior record,
fully warranted his dismissal.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties
to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
Award Number 23823 Page 3
Docket Number CL-23851
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
ATTEST: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
I
BY ~
/ Rosemarie Brasch-- Administrative Assistant
Dated lat Chicago, Illinois, this 26th day of
:arch 1982·