NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUS2MT BOA-RD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number
CL-23888
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
PARTIES TO DISPUTE: ( Freight Handlers, Ezpress and Station Employee
(The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Campan,Tp
STATEMENT OF MA324: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(G1.-934u)
that:
(1) Carrier violated the Agreement between the Portico rhea it
required M. E. Novoael, Jr... Clerk-Ca71er, DeForest Junction, Warren. Ohio,
to appear for investigation is connection with theft and cashing of company
pay drafts from Haselton Yard Office, Youngstorca, Rio; sad arbitrarily, without justification., inv
(2) Because of such impropriety., Claimant M. E. Novosel, Jr., shall
be reinstated to service of Carrier with all rights unimpaired, his service
record cleared of the charge, and he shall be compensated for all time lost.
OPINION
OF
BOARD: Claimant, Mr. M. E. Novosel, Jr.,, was employed as a clerk
caller is Carrier's facility at DeForest Junction, Warren,
Ohio, until he was dismissed from service on January 8,
1980
as a result of as
investigation held on December 20,
1979.
Claimant was charged with the theft
sad cashing of payroll checks stolen fry the Haseltoa Yard Office, Youngstown.,
Ohio.
At the investigation a Mr. Willie King testified that he had been
gives a paycheck payable to a G. C. Mike. This paycheck and three others had
been stolen from the Haseltoa Yard Office sometime between 10:00 PM, October 26,
19'T9,
and 7:00 AM, October 27,
1979.
Mr. King testified that he had. been given
the paycheck by Claimant to settle a debt that Claimant owed Mr. King. Mr. King
testified that he was told by Claimant to take out what was owed him sad to give
f`laimat the balance. By written statement a Mr. Joseph Marnakin stated that he
had talked to Claimant by telephone and Claimant advised that he was sending a
fellow worker in with a good paycheck to be cashed at the Hollywood Bar. Mr.
Maruskia cashed one of the payroll checks.
Petitioner_raisea_three-.prccedural_1gal.AA i
n.suppoxt of-Its- argumentthat Claimant was denied a fair and impartial investigat
Carrier's refusal to sequester the witnesses was fatal to a "fair and impartial
investigation" (2) that the fact that terrier did not cell all the parties possibly involved in the
(3)
that Carrier has failed to carry its burden of
proof in the investigation.
Award Number
23857
Docket Number
CL-23888
Page 2
While the hearing officer has the authority to sequester witnesses
if he so desires, his refusal to do so does not refer the investigation void.
(Third Division Award
27288)
The contention of the petitioner that the Carrier was under a duty
to call all the witnesses involved is the transactions is without merit. The
Carrier is entitled to call, only those witnesses it seems necessary to the
case. The Claimant knows the charges against him and if he deems it necessary to have witnesses who
secure the appearance of such witnesses or at least secure statements from
the same.
The Carrier utilized written statements from several individuals
who did not personally appear at the investigation. It has long been held
that such statements may be submitted as evidence and appropriate weight
will be given. to them.
As to the contention that the Carrier failed to carry its burden
of proof it has long been the rule is the Third Division that if the evidence
is not arbitrary or capricious., then the decision of the Carrier is not to be
disturbed. (Third Division Awards 1559~., 15167). This Hoard believes that
there is ample evidence in the records that Claimant gave the paychecks to
others to cash and facilitated the cashing of the sate to substantiate that
the findings of the hearing officer were not arbitrary and capricious, Based
upon these facts this Board x311 not upset the judgment of the hearing officer.
FILINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
retard aid all the evidence., finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral herring;
That the Carrier and the Eisployea involved is this dispute
are respectively (terrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Arty as approved June 21.,
1934;
That this Division of the Adjust meat Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; sad
That the Agree®~eut was nut violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
ATTEST: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
B~ <. c/Lc~sy
~mrle Breach - Administrative Assistant
T1e+arl
of*
A,inasnTllinnia_ +him OR+%, Aev n~P Sn~.il
IOFb
NATIONAL RAILROAD ~9I1L1'SJ5%NT HOARD
By Order of Third Division