NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number SG-23315
George E. Larney, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railroad
Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of
Railroad signalmen on the former Texas & Pacific Railway
Company:
On behalf of Signalmen J. E. McCarty, B. M. Blackman, and D. B.
McCarty, for eighty hours' each at their respective rates, account on September
14,
1978, 10 U.T.B. relays were shipped off the former Texas & Pacific property
for repair at Sedalia, Missouri." (Carrier file: K 315-175)
OPINION OF BOARD: The Organization has progressed the instant claim having
to do with transfer of repair work on ten (10) GRS-type
U.T.B. signal relays, based on the contention such transfer of work was violative
of the Signalman's Scope Rule contained in its controlling Agreement with the
Texas and Pacific Railway Company, bearing effective date of May 1, 1957. We note
from the record evidence however, that prior to the origination of this instant
claim, the Texas and Pacific Railway Company merged with the Missouri Pacific
Railroad Company into a "single system". In so merging the parties became
subject to the various provisions of Mediation Agreement A-7128, effective
February
7,
1965, which among other things provides for the following:
ARTICLE VI
"SECTION 2. Ea the event of merger or consolidation of two
or more carriers, parties to this Agreement on which this
agreement is applicable, or parts thereof, into a single
system subsequent to the date of this agreement, the merged,
surviving or consolidated carrier will constitute a single
system for purposes of this agreement, and the provisions
hereof shall apply accordingly, and the protections and
benefits granted to employes under this agreement shall
continue in effect."
ARTICLE III
"SECTION 1. The Organizations recognize the right of the
Carriers to make technological, operational and organizational
changes, and in consideration of the protective benefits
provided by
this Agreement the Carrier shall have the right
to transfer work and/or transfer employees throughout the
system which do not require the crossing of craft lines."
Award Number
23876
Page
2
Docket Number
SG-23315
ARTICLE VII: DISPT.R'ES COMMITTEE
"SECTION 1. Any dispute involving the interpretation or
application of any of the terms of this agreement and not
settled on the carrier may be referred by either party to
the dispute for decision to a committee consisting of two
members of the Carriers' Conference Committees signatory
to this agreement, two members of the Employes' National
Conference Committee signatory to this agreement, and a
referee to be selected as hereinafter provided. The referee
selected shall preside at the meetings of the committee and
act as chairman of the committee. A majority vote of the
partisan members of the committee shall be necessary to
decide a dispute, provided that if such partisan members are
unable to reach -a decision, the dispute shall be decided by
the referee. Decisions so arrived at shall be final and
binding upon the parties to the dispute.
SECTION 2. The parties to this agreement will select a panel
of three potential referees for the purpose of disposing of
disputes pursuant to the provisions of this section. If the
parties are unable to agree upon the selection of the panel
of potential referees within 30 days of the date of the
signing of this agreement, the National Mediation Board shall
be requested to name such referee or referees as are
necessary to fill the panel within five days after the
receipt of such request. Each panel member selected shall
serve as a member of such panel for a period of one year,
if available. Successors to the members of the panel shall
be appointed in the same manner as the original appointees.
SECTION 3. Disputes shall be submitted to the committee by
notice in writing to the Chairman of the National Railway
Labor Conference and to the Chairman of the Employee' National
Conference Committee, signatories to this agreement, who shall
within 10 days of receipt of such notice, designate the
members of their respective committees who shall serve on the
committee and arrange for a meeting of the committee to
consider such disputes as soon as a panel referee is available to serve, and in no event mare than 1
Decision shall be made at the close of the meeting if
possible (such meeting not to continue for more than five
days) but in any event within five days of the date such
meeting is closed, provided that the partisan embers of
the c~ittee may by mutual agreement extend the duration
of the meeting and the period for decision. The notice
provided for in this Section
3
shall state specifically
the questions to be submitted to the committee for
decision; and the committee shall confine itself strictly
to decisions as to the questions so specifically submitted
to it.
Award Number Page
3
Docket Number
SG-23315
SECTION
4.
Should any representative of a party to a
dispute on any occasion fail or refuse to meet or act
as provided in Section 3, then the dispute shall be
regarded as decided in favor of the party whose representatives are not guilty of such failure or re
settled accordingly but without establishing a precedent
for any other cases; provided that a partisan member of
the committee may, in the absence of his partisan colleague,
vote on behalf of both.
SECTION
5.
The parties to the dispute will assume the
compensation, travel expense and other expense of their
respective partisan committee members. Unless other
arrangements are made, the office stenographic and other
expenses of the committee, including compensation and
expenses of the referee, shall be shared equally by the
parties to the dispute."
Carrier has taken the position that given the above quoted provisions,
the instant dispute falls within the jurisdiction of Special Board of Adjustment
No.
605
and therefore the Third Division of the Adjustment Board is without
authority to rule on the case at bar. As additional support for its position,
Carrier has cited numerous Third Division Awards upholding the jurisdiction
of Special Board of Adjustment No.
605
in comparable matters such as the one
here under consideration. We find in our review of these awards Third Division
Award
19723,
to be particularly pertinent and representative of our thinking
relative to the jurisdiction issue. In Award
19723,
we held:
"Carrier urges that the matter be referred to the Disputes
Committee provided for in Article VII of that Agreement.
In a long line of cases ore have held '... that when the
determination of a dispute is dependent upon the interpretation or application of the February
7, 1965
Agreement, that
procedures established and accepted by the parties themselves
for resolving disputes under that Agreement should be
respected.' (Award
17625)
Contrary to Petitioner's argument
that the terms of Article VII, Section 1 are permissive
(Supported by Award
18071),
we will reaffirm those awards
(19295, 19371, 18602, 19166, 19289, 18925, 18602
and a host
of others) which hold that the proper forum for resolving
disputes arising from the February
7, 1965
Agreement is the
Disputes Committee established under that Agreement. In this
case the issues cannot be resolved without an appropriate
interpretation under that Agreement."
We reaffirm here what we said in Award
19723,
and accordingly therefore,
we rule to dismiss the instant claim based on our lack of jurisdiction to
decide the issue in dispute.
Award Number 23$76 Page
4
Docket Number SG-23315
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 193+;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction aver
the dispute involved herein; and
That the claim must be dismissed.
A W A R D
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAIIROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
By A44-0-
Rosemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 13th day of May, 1982.
___.__,
c:~.~I,i; .
v
i
e-.
i: '