NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number
MW-23385
Joseph A. Sickles, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
Belt Railway Company of Chicago
STATEMENT OF CIAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when E. A. Perez was not properly
compensated far holiday pay for December
24, 1978
(Christmas Eve) and December
25s 1978
(Christmas Day) (Carrier's File
190-MOPW).
(2)
Because of the aforesaid violation, E. A. Perez shall be
allowed twelve (12) hours and forty
(40)
minutes of pay at the Assistant
Foreman's straight time rate."
OPINION OF BOARD: The Claimant, an Assistant Section Foreman, relieved the
regular Foreman when he was an vacation from December
18
through December
31, 1978.
However, Carrier did not allow him holiday pay
for Christmas Eve and Christmas Day.
The Claimant asserts that he is an "hourly rated" employe and as
such he should have received sixteen
(16)
hours of holiday pay whereas the
Carrier contends that the Claimant functioned as a "monthly rated" employe
and that he was compensated properly because the salary structure contemplates
holidays.
The Employes have cited, among others, Award
19756
which held that
a temporary assignment of hourly rated employes to monthly rated jobs, by
Carrier for its convenience, "... does not change the status of hourly rated
employees to monthly employees".
The Carrier has also cited Awards which have reached a contrary
conclusion. See for
example
Award
124
of Public Law Board
1366
and Fourth
Division Award
3713.
The Employes' contention seems to argue the equity of the situation.
Yet Rule
33
clearly points out the method of pay computation to be used. It
may be that the results are harsh, but it is not our function to rewrite
agreements to ease their application to a particular set of facts.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
Award Number 2388+ Page 2
Docket Number MW-23385
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 193.;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction aver
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJZISTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
BY
de~:
Rosemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 13th day of May, 1982.
// C`
i~ ~.
i i `' e~
d
,,
~\
Ch
1.7
cc
~ C'
U',