NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number SG-23450
Joseph A. Sickles, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Burlington Northern Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CIAIM: "Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of
Railroad Signalmen on the Burlington Northern:
Burlington Northern has unjustly dismissed Mr. W. D. Campbell from
service and in so doing violated Rules 54-C and
56
of the current Signalmen's
Agreement.
Carrier should now be required to reimburse
Ice.
Campbell for all
time lost and clear his personal record of any reference to the investigation
leading to his dismissal."
(General Chairman's File B-79-195Carrier File SI-20 6/5/79)
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant was notified of an investigation concerning
responsibility in connection with a collision. Subsequent
to the investigation, the Employe was dismissed from service, but was reinstated
some fifteen months later.
We are unable to find that the charge was defective an3 thus we will
consider the dispute on its merits. Further, we fail to find that the Employe
made any proper basis for the production of a witness. A Carrier may not
deprive an Employe of a means of defending himself nor may it treat an accused
in a devious manner. But there is nothing of record here which suggests such
a scheme by this Carrier.
Limiting our review to matters properly before us, we find the
record to be rather clear. There was a collision on December 20, 1978. Faulty
equipment led, or contributed to the accidents and the equipment vas under
the control of the Claimant. Further, the evidence supports a conclusion that
Claimant was less than diligent in his maintenance of the equipment.
The Employes have raised certain speculation, but have produced
nothing of record to warrant resolution of the dispute based upon that
speculation.
If the evidence supports the Carrier's conclusion of guilt, it is not
incumbent upon us to substitute our judgment.
Award Number 23914 Page 2
Docket Number SG-231+50
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employe within the
meaning of
the Railway labor
Act as approved June 21, 193+;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction aver
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
i
BY
Rosemarie Breach - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 8th day of June 1982.