_ NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSZttENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number Nbr-23936
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The discipline imposed upon Trackman J. B. Stephens ('letters
of caution' dated January
4
and 5, 1979) was without dust and sufficient
cause (system File
c-4
(13) -rBS/12-3909-32) J).
(2) Said 'letters of caution' shall be expunged from the claimant's
personal record and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered and for
all expenses incurred attending the hearing held on January 29, 1979·"
OPINION OF HOARD: The Claimant protests that two letters of caution for his
alleged failure to obtain permission for absence on each
of two days, or to furnish proof of his inability to do so, were issued without
,, Two issues are presented to the Board: (1) Whether the letters of
caution constitute disciplinary action; (2) whether there is substantial evi
dence of a probative nature to support the issuance of the letters. We answer
both in the affirmative.
In the opinion of the Board, the letters of caution must be deemed
to be disciplinary is nature. Their inclusion in the Claimant's personal record
reasonably indicates that they x311 be used as a base for the imposition of
further discipline for future infractions. The Carrier evidently believed
them to be disciplinary when it granted the Claimant's request for a hearing.
With respect to the second issue, it is undisputed that the Claimant
had the opportunity to properly justify his asserted inability to report the
absences but that he failed to do so. From that significant fact and from
the testimony accepted as c2edible by the Carrier, the Board concludes that
the record affords substantial support of a probative nature for the letters
of caution.
The claim will be denied.
FINDI`,rGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
' That the parties waived oral hearing;
Award Plumber 23958
Docket Number hbT-23936
That the Carrier sad the Employee involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Fk<ployes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Acts as approved June 21., 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
ATTEST: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
BY
emarie Breach - Administrative Assistant
Page 2
NATIONAL RAILROAD ALITUS7WNT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago., Illinois,, this 15th day of August 1982.