(C. P. Edington and Charles Richardson
 PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
 (Southern Railway System

 STATEMENT OF MAIM: "The Southern Railway Company violated the agreement with
 the Brotherhood of railway., Airline and Steamship Clerks
 (BRAC) when, on may 4, 197 , it abolished the positions of C. P. Fdington and
 Q3arlea Richardson,, Agent/Operator/Clerks at Harriman, Tennessee, a station on
 the Tennessee Division of the Southern Railway Company, and transferred the
 work to employees at Oakaale,Tennesaee, a station on the Kentucky Division of
 the Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway Co.,, and other employees
 not covered by the Agreement, namely train crews, without making any provisions
 whatsoever, namely an Implementing Agreement, to provide benefits for effected
 employees.

 The Claimants contend that provisions as outlined above would have been necessary before such a move could have taken place, in that not only was the work transferred from one Division to another, but is fact wen transferred from one Carrier to another. The Claimants are requesting the 'option' of: (1) Separation pay and (2) Sale of their homes to the Carrier and moving expenses to their present headquarters. In addition to these benefits, that would have been offered had such provisions as outlined above been made, the Claimants are requesting the 'option' of: (3) Merging their seniority, with full prior rights, into the Train and Engine Service Employees Seniority Roster, details to be outlined later."

 OPINION OF BOARD: Claimants are two clerks who have established seniority
 on Carrier's Knoxville District. Both were employed at
 Harriman, Tennessee when certain work functions and consequently their posi
 tions were abolished. Both exercised their seniority on positions at Clinton,
 Tennessee. _

 The claims as stated are said to be founded on as Agreement of 1965 with the BRAC. That Agreement cousins its own disputes resolutions provision and anything arising thereunder is without the ,jurisdiction of the Board. See Awards 19296, 18602, 17516, 14979 and any others.

 Claim is made that the Carrier should make as implementing agreement but no provision is cited to compel such action. One claim, mileage and deadhead pay is sought to be claim on the property. This claim is not properly before the Hoard.


There are no claims which have been raised which are properly before the Board; therefore all must be denied.

        FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record earl all the evidence, finds affil holds:


        That the parties waived oral hearing;


That the Carrier and the Employes involved is this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 193;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has ,jurisdiction aver the dispute involved herein; and

        That the Agreement was not violated.


                        A W A R D


        Claim denied.


                          NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT HOARD

                          By Order of Third Division


ATTEST: Acting Executive Secretary
        National Railroad Adjustment Board


BY
      semarie Breach - Administrative Assistant


Dated at Chicago., Illinois, this 15th day of November 1982.
                                      ~~GEI VED ~,.


                                            .1~^


                                    ~iCb

                                      'oogo Oif ce