(C. P. Fdingtoa and Charles Richardson
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Southern Railway System

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Mr Southern Railway Company violated the agreement with
the Brotherhood of Railway. Airline and Steamship Clerks
(BRAC) when, on may 4, 1979 it abolished the positions of C. P. Ediagtoa
and Charles Richardson,, Agent/operator/Clerks at Harriman, Tennessee, a
station on the Tennessee Division of the Southern Railway Company, and
transferred the work to employees at Oakdale., Tennessee, a station on the
Kentucky Division of the Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway
Company, and other employees not covered by the Agreement, namely train
crews., without making any provisions whasoever, namely as Implementing
Agreement, to provide benefits for effected employees.

The Claimants contend that provisions as outlined above would have been necessary before such a move could have taken place, is that not only was the work transferred from one Division to another, but indeed from one Carrier to Another. The Claimants are requesting Deadhead Pay and Mileage Pay for each working day, Prom their former headquarters at Harriman., Tennessee to their present headquarters at Clinton, Tennessee, a distance of thirty one (31) miles each way, until such provisions as outlined above are

granted, 18

OPINION OF BOARD: This is a companion filing to Award No. 24025 by the same tw
individual claimants before the Board. The entire record
and the submissions are virtually identical to that filing.

As in the other filing, the Board finds that the claims raised are too vague and uncertain to lend themselves to resolutions; that some of the claims raise matters outside the jurisdiction of the Board, notably the claim to be placed on the seniority roster of another~7~Yaft; and that one claim for continuing deadhead pay has not been raised on the property is improperly before the Board.

There are no claims which have been raised which are properly before the Board; therefore, all must be dismissed.




Award Number 24426
Docket Number MS-23908

Page 2

That the Carrier and the FSaployes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Acts as approved June 21j, 1934.9

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and.

That the Agreement was not violated.

A W A R D

Claim dismissed.

ATTEST: Acting Executive Secretary

NATIONAL RAILROAD AWM24MT HOARD
By Order of Third Division

National Railroad Adjustment Board

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of November 1982.



Chic okkc

Ei