NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-23932
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employee
PARTIES TO DISPITrE:
(Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it assigned Mechanical
Department employee to paint the interior of the General Shop Foreman's
office building at Iakeland, Florida on January 12, >,3 and 11+, 1979 (System File
c-4(36)-Tampa Div.-2/12-2(79-x+6) J3).
(2) Because of the aforesaid violation, Carpenters L. Deal and D. L.
Sullivan and Carpenter Helper B. J. Moore each be allowed pay at their respective
time and one-half rates for an equal proportionate share of the total number
of man-hours expended by Mechanical Department employee."
OPINION OF BOARD: Carrier had Mechanical Department employee paint the interior
of the General Shop Foreman's office at Lakeland Yard in
Lakeland, Florida. Claims were presented by the Brotherhood on behalf of the
B&B Subdepartment employee holding an assignment on a Division of Carrier which
included the Lakeland Yard. It is not denied that these employee were able to
do the painting.
The initial correspondence stated the facts and recited Rules 1, 2,
3, 4, and
5
from the Agreement between the Brotherhood and the Carrier. The
type of work claimed to have been historically and traditionally done by B&B
employee.
The Carrier responded to the claim letter with a letter of declination
which stated that the work of employee represented by the two crafts (carmen
and maintenance of way) is often overlapping and that the practice has resulted
in no clear lines of demarcation. Four examples of similar work being done
at different times are alleged. The Carrier in this correspondence, alleges
that on two occasions Mechanical Department employee had painted the interior
of this same building. Statements from two Mechanical Department employee who
had painted the building, one in 1973, the other in 1968, were appendaged to
the correspondence.
Rules 1, 2, 3,
4,
and
5
read:
"RULE 1
SCOPE
These Rules cover the hours of service, wages and
working conditions for all employees of the Maintenance
Award Number 2LC29 Page 2
Docket Number MW-23932
of Way and Strucures Department as listed by Subdepartments in Rule 5-Seniority Groups and Ranks
other employees who may subsequently be employed in said
Department, represented by Brotherhood of Maintenance of
Way Employes.
This Agreement shall not apply to: Supervisory
forces above the rank of foremen, clerical employees and
Signal and Communication Department employees."
Rule 2 reads in pertinent part:
"RULE 2
CONTRACTING
This Agreement requires that all maintenance work in
Maintenance of Way and Structures Department is to be
performed by employees subject to this Agreement except it
is recognized that, in specific instances, certain work that
is to be performed requires special skills not possessed by
the employees and the use of special equipment not owned
by or available to the Carrier. In such instances, the
Assistant Vice-President Engineering and Maintenance of
Way, and the General Chairman will confer and reach an
understanding setting forth the conditions under which
the work will be performed."
LvL:.
SL3Dy
: L:?= _; =~
The =loyees cove. red
by this
;T-:e.aent s!-_a11
be
L=ou^ed in subderartiMencs as follows:
(a) Track Subdepartment
(b) Bridge and Building Subdepartment
(c) Water Service, Fuel and Air Conditioning
Subdepartment
(d) Welding Subdeuartmeat
(e) Maintenance
of
Way - General" -'
"RULE
4
SENIORITY DISTRICTS
Seniority districts as referred to in Rule
5
shall be
as follows:
District Seniority
1. Rocky Mount and Raleigh Divisions
2. Florence and
Savannah Divisions
Award Number 2sC2' Page
3
Docket Number MW-23932
3. Atlanta and Waycross Divisions
4.
Jacksonville and Tampa Divisions (Miami
Division if and when established)
System Seniority
1. System'
"RUIE
5
SENIORITY GROUPS AND RANKS
Section 1
The seniority rights of employees shall be confined
to seniority districts as set forth in Rule
4
and t0
subdepartments and groups as shown below. The rank
sequence of employees within the various groups shall be
as shown below, the lowest number designating the highest
rank and the highest number the lowest rank in the group.
E*
Bridge and Building Subdepartment Seniority Districts
Group A
Rank 1 - Carpenter Foremen )
Rank 2 - Carpenter )
Rank
3
- Carpenter Helpers ) District
Rank
4
- Laborers (when gang exceeds)
10 men)
3HE-X-)F3E
The groups listed in Section 1 of this Rule
5
shall
inslude the following, as well as any other positions or
classes that should properly be included or that may be
added in the future.
-x-x
-HNE
Bridge and Building Subdepartment
,:-ovr ~: _-_i_e Gangs.
Award Number 24028 Page 4
Docket Number MW-23932
Group D: Metal Bridge Gangs and Metal Bridge Paint
Gangs (including their Welders and Welder
Helpers)
Group E: Concrete Gangs
Group F: Scale Gangs
Group G: Building Department Electrical Workers
(except those in the Water Service, Fuel &
Air Conditioning Subdepartment)
Group H: Plumbing Workers."
Rule 1 is the Scope rule. It is a generalized rule which does not
outline any rights to specific work. Such general scope rules do not give any
craft an elusive right to specific work. If such a right is to be established
it must be proved that the work has been exclusively performed by the claiming
craft on a systemwide basis. See Award 10585, 8831, 12972, 20232 and many others.
In this instant case the Carrier not only alleged examples of intermingled
work on the system, but also furnished evidence that the painting has been
performed by different crafts on the very building in question. The Claimant
has not established his claim under Rule 1.
Rule 2 is entitled contracting. Claimant cited an award that held
that contracting out painting work at the Kissimee, Florida was violative of
Rule 2 of the Agreement. Claimant states that this award is conclusive on
this case.
Rule 2 determines work priority between the Maintenance of Way and
Structures employe s and employes of outside contractors, that is employes of
other than Carrier. A contracting rule is not held to determine priority
of work between employes of the Carrier. If a jurisdictional dispute is to
be settled, the solution must be found in some other rule.
Rules 3, 4, and 5 concern seniority rights with subdepartments established under the Agreement. Nowh
work to be dote by the employee classified under the rules. As such these
rules are not pertinent to this claim.
Claimant has not established that painting yard building interiors
has been the exclusive work of the B&B Subdepartment. Nothing has been said that
would negate the evidence of the Carrier that this building has been painted
in the past by Mechanical Department forces. Therefore, Claimant has not
met the burden of proof necessary to establish its right to tfre work in
question.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
Award Number 2402° Page
5
Docket Number hb1-23932
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
BY
)~ Rosemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of November =2.