(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE: ( '


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the~System Committee of the Brotherhood that:

(1) The Agreement was violated when the position of extra gang foreman (Extra Gang No. 7) as advertised by Bulletin No. 505 dated March 13, 1979 was awarded to an applicant junior to Fabian Casarez (System File MofW 138-55).







OPINION OF BOARD: it is contended by the Organization that Claimant F. Casarez
being the more senior employe should have been awarded the Extra Gang Foreman position under Rule 8 aver a less senior employe selected on March 29, 1979. However, a review of the record by this Board establishes that the other employe had already applied for and had qualified as a Foreman some time prior to Claimant's application for training under Rule 8, and in addition the other employe already had expreience as a relief foreman at the time of Claimant's application. Thus, the Carrier's selection of the other employe for the position of Foreman as of March 29, 1979 was not arbitrary, capricious or in bad faith (See Third Division Award 23368). Therefore Claimant is not entitled to that promotion and the claim for back pay is denied accordingly.





That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and



                      Docket Number I·Ed-23837

                      A W A R D


        Claim denied.


                        · NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                        By Order of Third Division


Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By :. ,.t~c_ ~~t.s=c~
Rosemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

Dat at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th day of January 1983.