NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-24205
Edward L. Suatrup, Referee
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE
(Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The dismissal of Trackman J. T. Luckey for alleged violation
of Rule No. '18' was arbitrary and is violation of the Agreement (System File
C-4(13)-JTL/12-39(80-18) H).
(2) The claimant shall be reinstated with seniority and all other
rights unimpaired, his record be cleared of the charge leveled against him and
he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered."
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant, while off duty and off Carrier's property, allegedly
fatally wounded a man on February 17, 1979. Claimant
continued to protect his assignment, however, until November 9, 1979. On this
date he obtained permission from the Carrier to be absent fry his assignment to
appear in court. Subsequently Claimant pled guilty to the charge of voluntary
manslaughter on November 14, 1979 and he was sentenced in the Superior Court of
the County of Meckleaberg, North Carolina to six to ten years in prison with
eligibility for parole in four years. The presiding fudge recommended that
Claimant be put on work release and that part of his earnings while on work
release and/or parole be sent to the mother of the man Claimant killed to
reimburse her (in the amount of $1,203.00) for funeral expenses. A stipulation
of Claimant's plea of voluntary manslaughter was that he serve a mandatory
minimum sentence of four
(4)
months in prison.
On November 26, 1979 Carrier bulletined the Claimant's position on
Section Force 5706 as a permanent position vacancy sad on November 27, 1979
Carrier notified Claimant to attend a formal hearing on December 6, 1979 for the
alleged contravention of Rule 18 of the Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company's
Safety Rules for Engineering and Maintenance of Way Employee. Rule 18 reads:
"Disloyalty, dishonesty, desertion, intemperance
immorality, vicious or uncivil conduct, insubordination, sleeping on duty, incompetence, making fals
statements, or concealing facts concerning matters
under investigation, will subject the offender to'
dismissal."
An investigation was held on December
6,
1979 and the Claimant was
absent although neither Claimant nor his representative requested a postponement
prior to that date. On December 14, 1979 Claimant was informed by the Carrier
that he had been found guilty as charged and that he was being dismissed from
service.
Award Number 247.24
Docket Number NW-24205
Page 2
A complete review of the facts of this case leads the Board to conclude
that there is sufficient substantial evidence present to warrant the conclusion
that Claimant was is violation of Rule
18
of Carrier's Safety Rules. As a
procedural point, Organization argues that Claimant did not receive a fair
hearing on December
6, 1979
because he was not present at the hearing. Aside
from the facts, important enough in themselves in the mind of the Board, that
neither Claimant nor Organization requested a postponement prior to the actual
time of the hearing itself, nor was'Claimant's representative able to give an
alternative date for a hearing since it was not really clear how long Claimant
was to remain in prison (only the minimal amount of time was known), the Board
finds nothing improper per se, in a case of this type, in holding a hearing
in absentia. The contravention of Carrier's Rule
18
was based on the fact of
Claimant
s
caiviction of a pawl laws which had already occurred
and which was on record, which the Claimant's personal presence at the hearing
would not have changed one way or the other.
The Organization's contention that Claimant's position be ruled as a
temporary vacancy rather than a permanent vacancy is also found to be without
merit by the Board in this case. Rule
8,
Section 1 of the Agreement between
the parties makes it clear that positions vacated for more than thirty (30)
days can be designated as permanent vacancies: and at the very least, from the
record presented to this Board, Claimant was required to be absent from his
position for a minimum of four
(4)
months.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21,
1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
.1011
Claim denied.
Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Hoard
NATIONAL RAIIROAD
Al?d'USTWTT~
~SOARD
By Order of Third Division
Rosemarie Branch - Administrative Assistant
c:hicatto, Illinois, this 14th day of January
1983·