NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-24320
Robert W. McAllister, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-9523)
that:
1. Carrier violated the Clerks' Rules Agreement when it arbitrarily
dismissed Mr. S. J. Thompson from its service, following investigation, without
giving reasonable consideration to all circumstances involved. (Carrier File - C)
2. Carrier's action was arbitrary, unjust and unreasonable.
3.
Carrier shall now be required to return Mr. Thompson to its service
with all rights unimpaired and compensate him for all wage losses sustai'led due
to Carrier's arbitrary, unjust and unreasonable action.
OPINION OF BOARD: The Claimant, Samuel John Thompson, is a Yard Clerk at the
Carrier's Madison Yard who has seniority since January 17,
1964. As a result of an investigation, the Claimant was terminated from service
with the Carrier for violation of Safety Rule F, General Rules 1107 and 1110.
These rules are as follows:
"Rule F Employees must report to the proper officer by
quickest available means of communication, the
details of accident, failures of motive power,
failure in the supply of water or fuel, defects
in track, bridges, signals or any unusual con
ditions which may affect the movement of trains."
"Rule 1107 When a person is injured, or if there is property
damage, the employee in charge must be notified at
once and he in turn must notify the Superintendent's
office, and/or such others as may be required."
"Rule 1110 Each employee who may be in any way connected with
or who may witness a personal injury, shall before
leaving work, make a complete written report on
both sides of personal injury form (A-54) and
forward it to the head of his department, and
shall also make such additional statements as may
be requested by the Law or Claim Departments'
representatives, without delay."
Award Number 24220 Page 2
Docket Number CL-21+320
The essential facts are undisputed. The Claimant was working the
assignment of the Chief Clerk beginning at 11:00 P.M. on September 27 through
7:00 A.M., September 28, 1980. leaving the Clerk's office enroute to the
Trainmaster's office in the Tower, the Claimant, in the act of delivering early
morning turnover reports, bumped his elbow on a staircase support post. The
time was approximately
6:05
A. M. He delivered the reports.
At 3:09 P.M., September 28, 1980, Claimant called the Crewboard office
and laid off sick, reporting the injury. As suggested, he immediately called
the Trainmaster. Thereafter, it was determined to mark Claimant as off with a
personal injury. The next day, Claimant filled out an appropriate personal
injury report.
The Organization argues Claimant did not know he sustained an injury
until about 3:00 P.M, on September 28 when he woke up. Since Claimant was
unaware of his injury until after leaving work, the Organization contends the
delay in filing the personal injury is understandable and reasonable.
Careful review of the record before us leads this Board to unmistakingly
conclude the Carrier's assessment of the record correctly viewed the evidence
as supporting a finding Claimant was aware he injured himself and simply did not
comply with the understood rules. The Claimant acknowledged he was aware
he bumped his elbow when it happened because he said it "hunt like-hell.."
and "it almost brought me down to my knees because it hurt
..."
There can be
no doubt Claimant had the time and opportunity to properly report the injury as
required.
Under these circumstances, this Board agrees that Carrier was justified
in disciplining Claimant, however, we do not view his single infraction as
justifying discipline in the form of dismissal. That action was excessive and
lacked proportion to the justifiable discipline involved. This Claimant has
been out of service for a lengthy period. We hold this time shall serve as a
suspension, which should, in its severity, constitute sufficient notice to
Claimant he must in the future comply with the Carrier's rules dealing with the
reporting of injuries.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the discipline was excessive.
Award Number 24220
Docket Number CL-24320
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion.
Page 3
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
2By
l.~
Rosemarie BraBch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th day of March 1983.