NATIONAL
RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT
BOARD -
- THIRD DIVISION Docket Number
MW-24346 -
Robert W. McAllister, Referee
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE: - _-- - _
Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that: .
(1) The dismissal of Trackman J. L. Nickerson for leaving his 'Job
without proper authority' at 'about
3:00
P.M., Monday, August 11,
1980'
was
without just and sufficient cause, unwarranted and an abuse of justice and
discretion by the Carrier.
(2)
The claimant shall be reinstated with seniority and all other
rights unimpaired, his record be cleared and he shall be compensated for all wage
loss suffered."
OPINION OF BOARD: The Claimant, J. L. Nickerson, was initially emplqyed by
Carrier as a track laborer on February
23, 1979.
He was
discharged, effective September
18, 1980,
for leaving his job without authorization
and for failing to work overtime. The'Organization contends the discharge was
without just and sufficient cause, was unwarranted, and an abuse of justice and
managerial discretion.
The record indicates that on August 11,
1980,
Claimant was one of three
men working under a section foreman. At about
2:30
P.M., the Roadmaster told
the section foreman not to let anyone go because stripped joints and a broken rail
had been found and had to be corrected. It is undisputed Claimant worked until
approximately
3:30
P.M. and left without permission and without working, as
instructed.
On the basis of this evidence, it is clear the Claimant was guilty of
an offense requiring disciplinary action. The Board, however, notes Claimant's
wife was hospitalised for cancer treatment and Claimaut's child was entrusted to
a baby sitter who required the baby to be picked up in time to enable her to go
to work. This Board does not condone disobedience, but, herein, Claimant's
conduct should have been weighed in a manner whereby his responsibilities to his
job were considered along with his obvious dilemma triggered by his wife's
hospitalization. Some form of serious
discipline
was in order,, but not permanent
loss of his
sob.
Claimant's absence from Work villa therefore, be
considered a
suspensionp and he will be reinstated with his seniority rights intact, but
without back pay.
FINDINGS; The Third Division of the Adjustment Board.. upon the whole record
and ell the evidence,, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
Award Number
24256
Docket Number
rb7-24346
Page
2
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway labor Act,
as approved June 21,
1934;
That this Divisiat of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the discipline was excessive.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion.
NATIONAL RAIIROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
'..
~JF>
By
Rosemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this
23rd day of march 1983.
012 319
ego office,